I've been reading pages such as this one: http://comp.uark.edu/~jgeabana/blochapps/bloch.html

Which talk about the Bloch sphere, but I've been unable to figure out how to plot states on the sphere due to both states being a complex number, thus resulting in 4 "coordinates".

Many sources say it's only the relative angle between the states that matters, but that seems odd to me, since there is an absolute $|0\rangle$ and $|1\rangle$ state, which makes it think that both imaginary parts of the complex values matter.

So, how would I plot things like these, or at least, how would I convert them to spherical coordinates for plotting on the bloch sphere?

$$1/\sqrt{2}(|0\rangle + |1\rangle)$$ $$1/\sqrt{2}(|0\rangle - |1\rangle)$$ $$1/2(\sqrt{3}|0\rangle + |1\rangle)$$

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I dare you to pass the turing test Normal Human! Your response was too quick :P $\endgroup$ – Alan Wolfe Oct 16 '15 at 20:12

Using equation (1) of your link, consider your first qubit:

$$\cos\theta/2 = 1/\sqrt 2, \quad e^{i\phi}\sin\theta/2 = 1/\sqrt 2$$

Hence--given the range of values of $\theta$ and $\phi$--we have $\theta = \pi/2$ and $\phi = 0$.

Proceed similarly for the other qubits.

An important thing to remember about qubits is that we don't care about overall phase. Hence if we have a qubit of the form

$$|\psi\rangle = e^{i\alpha}a|0\rangle + e^{i\beta}b|1\rangle = e^{i\alpha} \left( a|0\rangle + e^{i(\beta-\alpha)}b|1\rangle \right) $$

we find the Bloch representation of $a|0\rangle + e^{i(\beta-\alpha)}b|1\rangle $.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! Why is it that we don't care about overall phase? if the answer isn't too long for a comment hehe $\endgroup$ – Alan Wolfe Oct 16 '15 at 20:40
  • $\begingroup$ Because a multiple of a phase $e^{i\theta}$ of a coefficient doesn't affect the probability of being in a given state. It is however worth keeping track of the phase difference between the components so we don't dispense with phase altogether. $\endgroup$ – Simon S Oct 16 '15 at 20:44
  • $\begingroup$ oh got it. thanks! $\endgroup$ – Alan Wolfe Oct 16 '15 at 20:44

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.