4
$\begingroup$

I have to calculate the following limit:

$A=\displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left(\displaystyle \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} \left(\frac{1}{1+2^{n-k}}\right) \right) $

Where $\ n $ and $\ k $ are elements of the natural numbers.

Because we never did that in class, I am not sure as what I did is right. I got the following:

$\ 1 \leqslant A=\displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} (\displaystyle \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} (\frac{1}{1+2^{n-k}}) ) \leqslant \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} (\displaystyle \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} (\frac{1}{2^{n-k}}) ) \leqslant \displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} (\displaystyle \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} (\frac{2^{k}}{2^{n}}) ) = \frac{\displaystyle \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty}2^{k}}{\displaystyle \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}2^{n}} $

Now its obvious that both limes are going to infinity, but how can I argue that they both like start at the same index $\ k $ and $\ n $ and so we could substitute both to the same variable and take the same limes so we would get the limit of 1 and then I could use the Sandwich theorem to tell that the limit of A is equal to 1.

Thank you

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Limes?${}{}{}{}{}{}{}$ $\endgroup$ Oct 13, 2015 at 14:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Omnomnomnom limeslimits.wordpress.com $\endgroup$
    – imranfat
    Oct 13, 2015 at 14:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you mean lime trees or lime citrus? $\endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Oct 13, 2015 at 14:48
  • $\begingroup$ @gammaALpha What worries me a bit is the order in which the limits for $k$ and $n$ are taken. That changes the outcome. Since the k-limit is inside the brackets, doe we have to consider that limit first? Or do we look at the limits simultaneously? In that case, the exponent of $2$ becomes indeterminate $\endgroup$
    – imranfat
    Oct 13, 2015 at 14:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Im sorry english is not my native language, of course lime trees! Seriously, I mean limes as the limit of a sequence $\endgroup$
    – gammaALpha
    Oct 13, 2015 at 14:50

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

The order of the two limits is important. If you reverse the order you get a different answer. You need to do the inner one first then the outer one.

As the inner limit doesn't depend on $n$ you can rewrite it as: $$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(2^{-n}\lim_{k\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{2^{-n}+2^{-k}})$$ The inner limit is then just $\frac{1}{2^{-n}}$ which would cancel giving you $$\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}1=1$$

Or did you mean a limit where both are happening at the same time? If so you shouldn't use two different variables.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I see now that the order is important, and no not a limit where both are happening, this was just a thought. So do i have to do first the inner limit and then the outer? This means in this case the limit would be inifinty? $\endgroup$
    – gammaALpha
    Oct 13, 2015 at 14:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Updated to show how to get the limit. $\endgroup$
    – Ian Miller
    Oct 13, 2015 at 15:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.