I am looking for a proof of the following fact:

Every compact topological $n$-manifold $M$ has a continuous and not nullhomotopic map $f: S^k \rightarrow M$ for some sphere $S^k$ with $1 \leq k \leq n$.

I came into this while reading a proof of Lyusternik-Fet theorem that every compact Riemannian manifold has a closed non trivial geodesic, but can't prove it, nor find any reference. The statement is equivalent to saying that a compact topological manifold has at least a non trivial homotopy group in the range $1,...,n=dim(M)$. The statement is obvious if $M$ is not simply connected, so let's see what can be said when $M$ is simply connected.

If $M$ is closed, [connected] and orientable, then Poincaré Duality applies; so we have $H_n (M) = \mathbb{Z}$ (singular homology with integer coefficients). Now, even if all $\pi _k$ are trivial for $1 \leq k \leq n-1$, we can still conclude by Hurewicz Isomorphism theorem that $\pi_n(M)=H_n(M)=\mathbb{Z}$, and so we are done.

However I need the more general case of $M$ compact, regardless of orientability, and I don't understand how/why simply connectedness + compactness together imply the existence of a non trivial map from some higher sphere.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ You probably always mean closed (i.e. without boundary) manifolds since the statement is not true for a disk. Could you then not pass to the orientable double cover and apply your reasoning? $\endgroup$ – Michael Bächtold May 21 '12 at 13:50
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ In other words, simply connected implies orientable. $\endgroup$ – Justin Young May 21 '12 at 14:03
  • $\begingroup$ @Michael : you're right, I always mean closed. Thank you both, now I see how things work; I was not aware of the orientable double cover construction, as well as the implication "simply connected => orientable". $\endgroup$ – Lor May 21 '12 at 16:15

Any connected covering space of $M$ corresponds to a conjugacy class of subgroups of $\pi_1(M)$, and so if $M$ is simply connected then the only connected covering space of $M$ is $1\colon M\to M$. But if $M$ is non-orientable, then we would have a connected double cover since $M$ is closed, a contradiction, and so $M$ must be orientable.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.