Suppose $A$ and $B$ are separated, bounded sets; i.e., there is an $\alpha \in \mathbb{R}$, $\alpha > 0$ such that $|a - b|\geq \alpha$ for all $a \in A$, $b \in B$. Prove $\underline{\mathbf{\text{directly from the definition}}}$ of $\mathbf{m^{*}}$ that $\mathbf{m^{*}(A \cup B) = m^{*}(A)+m^{*}(B)}$.

This question has been asked before on here, although not exactly in this way. Further, none of the answers have been sufficient - just hints that don't do enough at 1) including intermediate steps and 2) explaining the why behind those intermediate steps.

I would like a full solution (with proper subscripting - I'm having some issues with that in my own solution) using the same method (showing directly by the definition of an outer measure $m^{*}$).

I have made several attempts at this problem. This is the gist of them:

1. $\underline{\text{Showing that}\, \mathbf{m^{*}(A \cup B) \leq m^{*}(A)+m^{*}(B)}}$: Consider $I = \left( a-\frac{\alpha}{4}, a + \frac{\alpha}{4} \right)$ and $J=\left(b-\frac{\alpha}{4},b+\frac{\alpha}{4} \right)$, where $a \in A$, $b \in B$. Then, $A \subseteq \cup_{a \in A}I$, but $\left(\cup_{a \in A}I \right)\cap B = \emptyset$ since each $l(I) = \frac{\alpha}{4} < \alpha \leq |a-b|$ (where $l$ is the length of the interval).

Similarly, we have $B \subseteq \cup_{b \in B}J$, where $\left(\cup_{a \in A}J \right)\cap A = \emptyset$ since each $l(J) = \frac{\alpha}{4} < \alpha \leq |a-b|$.

So, $A \cup B \subseteq \left[\cup_{a \in A}I \right] \cup \left[\cup_{b \in B}J \right] = \cup_{c \in A\cup B}K$.

Finally, since $m^{*}$ is a measure, $\forall \epsilon > 0$, we have $m^{*}(A \cup B) = \inf\left( \sum_{c \in A \cup B} l(K_{c})\right)= \inf \left( \sum_{a \in A}l(I_{a}) + \sum_{b \in B}l(J_{b})\right)$ (since $A$ and $B$ are disjoint, we can consider separately those intervals covering $A$ from those covering $B$) $\leq \sum_{a \in A}l(I_{a})+\sum_{b \in B}l(J_{b})\leq m^{*}(A)+\frac{\epsilon}{2} + m^{*}(B) + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = m^{*}(A) + m^{*}(B)+\epsilon$.

Since this holds for all $\epsilon > 0$, it holds for $\epsilon = 0$

2. $\underline{\text{Showing that}\, \mathbf{m^{*}(A)+m^{*}(B) \leq m^{*}(A \cup B)}}$: Although I know there are problems with the other direction, I feel completely lost in this direction.

Using the same covers for $A$ and $B$ from the first direction, by definition of the outer measure, we have $m^{*}(A) + m^{*}(B) = \inf \left\{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}l(I_{n}) \right\}+\inf \left\{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}l(J_{n}) \right\}$

Now, from here I am not sure how to proceed. I suspect that since as we add in more and more terms, the sums get bigger, that the two greatest lower bounds ($\inf$s) each equal $\frac{\alpha}{4}$. Then the above inequality would in turn be $=\frac{\alpha}{2} < \alpha \leq |a-b|$, but I'm not entirely sure how that would help me.

Essentially, what I would like to see someone post in a solution is a full solution using the definition of the outer measure $m^{*}$. What would be ideal is a solution based on what I have done here with all the bad bits fixed.


First, if your definition of $m^*$ is the axiomatic one (see here), then part 1. of your proof is unnecessary because outer measures are countably subadditive by definition. But since you are working with Lebesgue measure on $\mathbb{R}$ I will assume your definition is $$ m^*(A) = \inf\{|U|: U\supset A, ~U~\text{open}\} $$ where $|U|$ denotes Lebesgue measure or premeasure, which should be well-defined at this point for open sets.

Then for part 2. what we want to show is that $m^*(A)+m^*(B)$ is a lower bound for the set $$ \{|U|: U\supset A\cup B,~U~\text{open}\}. $$ Ok, so let's take an open set $U$ containing $A\cup B$. Also, let's cover $A$ with balls of radius $a/4$, and call the union of these balls $U_A$. Similarly, cover $B$ with balls of radius $a/4$ and call the union $U_B$. Then $U_A$ and $U_B$ are both open and disjoint by the separation property. Then $V_A = U_A\cap U$ and $V_B = U_B\cap U$ are also open, still disjoint, and $V_A\supset A$, $V_B\supset B$. By definition of outer measure, $$ m^*(A)\leq |V_A|<\infty,~m^*(B)\leq |V_B|<\infty. $$ The finiteness of these quantities is due to the assumption that $A$ and $B$ are bounded. We then observe that since $V_A$ and $V_B$ are pairwise disjoint and open, $$ |V_A| + |V_B| = |V_A\cup V_B|. $$ Since $V_A\cup V_B\subset U$, it follows now that $$ m^*(A)+m^*(B) \leq |V_A| + |V_B| = |V_A\cup V_B| \leq |U|. $$ (Notice what we have in the middle - we've moved ourselves from the realm of arbitrary sets to the realm of open sets, where we know how Lebesgue premeasure behaves. This is the key idea.) Since $U$ was an arbitrary open set containing $A\cup B$, it then follows by definition of infimum that $$ m^*(A)+m^*(B) \leq m^*(A\cup B). $$

  • $\begingroup$ is my part 1 correct, though? You didn't say anything about it. $\endgroup$ – ALannister Oct 12 '15 at 5:10
  • $\begingroup$ While I suggest you write it up more carefully than as it is right now, the ideas for your part 1 are generally sound. $\endgroup$ – Gyu Eun Lee Oct 13 '15 at 2:52
  • $\begingroup$ the definition of outer measure I'm using is $m^{*}(A)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}l(I_{k})$, where $A\subseteq\cup_{k=1}^{\infty}I_{k}$. How do I express $V_{A}$ and $V_{B}$ this way so I can use definition of outer measure to say $m^{*}(A) \leq \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(\text{intervals in}\,V_{A})$, $m^{*}(B) \leq \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(\text{intervals in}\,V_{B})$, and also have $\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(\text{intervals in}\,V_{A}) + \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(\text{intervals in}\,V_{B}) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(\text{intervals in}\,V_{A}\cup V_{B})$ from the fact that $V_{A}$ and $V_{B}$ are pairwise disjoint? $\endgroup$ – ALannister Oct 13 '15 at 8:27
  • $\begingroup$ In one dimension, open balls are disjoint unions of at most countably many intervals. $\endgroup$ – Gyu Eun Lee Oct 13 '15 at 20:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.