0
$\begingroup$

If $$A=\{1,{\{\emptyset}\}\}$$

then is $$B={\{\emptyset}\} \subseteq A?$$

I would say yes it is because it is the set containing the empty set, but the solution says it is not. Why is this?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Empty set is an element of A so B is an element of A. $\endgroup$ – Yunus Syed Oct 5 '15 at 23:18
  • $\begingroup$ Hi that doesnt really help to clarify for me $\endgroup$ – PersonaA Oct 5 '15 at 23:19
  • $\begingroup$ @PersonaA That's good that you found the statement unhelpful -- Empty set is most definitely not an element of $A$. $\endgroup$ – pjs36 Oct 5 '15 at 23:26
  • $\begingroup$ As a side comment: $B \in A$, but $B \not\subseteq A$. $\endgroup$ – Brian Tung Oct 5 '15 at 23:26
0
$\begingroup$

The solution is correct: it is not. In order for $B$ to be a subset of $A$, every element of $B$ must be an element of $A$. What are the elements of $B$? There is only one, $\varnothing$. What are the elements of $A$? $1$ and $\{\varnothing\}$. Neither of these is $\varnothing$, so $\varnothing\notin A$, and therefore $B\nsubseteq A$. Note that $\varnothing$, the element of $B$, and $\{\varnothing\}$, one of the elements of $A$, are not the same thing: $\varnothing$ is a set with no members, and $\{\varnothing\}$ is a set with one member, that one member being the set $\varnothing$.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ But B is the set contain the null set right? $\endgroup$ – PersonaA Oct 5 '15 at 23:21
  • $\begingroup$ @PersonaA: $B$ is the set whose only element is the null set. But the null set is not an element of $A$, so $B$ is not a subset of $A$. (You may be getting confused by the fact that $\varnothing$ is a subset of every set; it’s not an element of every set, however.) $\endgroup$ – Brian M. Scott Oct 5 '15 at 23:23
  • $\begingroup$ @PersonaA: You’re welcome. $\endgroup$ – Brian M. Scott Oct 5 '15 at 23:27
  • $\begingroup$ Set theorists make everything a set. So what is are natural numbers in set theory? The usual definition is $0=\phi$ and $n+1=n\cup \{n\}$. $\endgroup$ – DanielWainfleet Oct 6 '15 at 0:56
  • $\begingroup$ @user254665: Yes, and the set of natural numbers is then $\omega$, whose existence is guaranteed by the axiom of infinity. If one is using that formalism, $A=\{1\}$, and $B=\{0\}=1$. $\endgroup$ – Brian M. Scott Oct 6 '15 at 1:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.