0
$\begingroup$

Find the radius of convergence of this series and study what happens in the border. $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{z^n}{n}$ ($z\in \Bbb{C}$)

I easily found that the radius of convergence is $\rho =1$, therefore the series doesn't converge absolutely for $|z|=\rho=1$ , since $\sum|\frac{z^n}{n}|$ diverges in this case.

Therefore I want to use a convergence criteria, Dedekind or Dirichlet, but my problem is that the partial sums of $z_n =z^n$ with $|z|=1$ are not bounded.

Any hint?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "the series doesn't converge absolutely" - this depends on the value of $z$. In this case it converges absolutely iff $|z|<1$. $\endgroup$ – Mario Carneiro Oct 5 '15 at 20:14
  • $\begingroup$ I had wrong the order of my sentence! thanks! $\endgroup$ – Joaquin Liniado Oct 5 '15 at 20:16
  • $\begingroup$ Why do you think those partial sums are not bounded? $\endgroup$ – zhw. Oct 5 '15 at 20:18
2
$\begingroup$

In fact, the partial sums are bounded. Note that for $z$ with $|z| = 1$ and $z \neq 1$, $$ \left|\sum_{k=0}^n z^n\right| = \left|\frac{1 - z^{n+1}}{1 - z}\right| = \frac{|1 - z^{n+1}|}{|1 - z|} \leq \frac{2}{|1-z|} $$ The Dirichlet criterion applies.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is the first $\le$ not actually an equal sign? And can you explain how you get the last estimate $\frac{2}{|1-z|}$? $\endgroup$ – philmcole Dec 6 '17 at 13:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @philmcole well spotted. And I used the triangle inequality: $|1 - z^{n + 1}| \leq |1| + |-z^{n+1}| = 2$ $\endgroup$ – Omnomnomnom Dec 6 '17 at 13:14
0
$\begingroup$

Remember that the radius of convergence is defined as the supremum of convergent series, so there is no need to look on the boundary point itself, if you can get away with a limiting argument. In this case, since it doesn't converge at $z=1$ we know $R\le1$, and conversely we can consider an arbitrary $z$ with $|z|<1$; then $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{|z|^n}n\le\sum_{n=0}^\infty|z|^n=\frac1{1-|z|}.$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "Remember that the radius of convergence is defined as the supremum of convergent series" Not sure what you mean. $\endgroup$ – zhw. Oct 5 '15 at 20:20
  • $\begingroup$ @zhw. The radius of convergence of $\sum_na_nz^n$ is defined as $R=\sup\{z\in\Bbb R\mid\sum_na_nz^n\mbox{ converges}\}$. $\endgroup$ – Mario Carneiro Oct 5 '15 at 20:22
  • $\begingroup$ Never seen it defined that way. But it's equivalent to the definition I know. $\endgroup$ – zhw. Oct 5 '15 at 20:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.