3
$\begingroup$

In our class, our professor said cantor set is clopen (both closed and open). One argument is that the interior of a cantor set intersecting with a closed interval, say $A = \Delta \cap [0,1/3]$ whose interior is $A$ itself. From my point of view, the interior should be empty. Is there any difference if we considered $A$ as a subset of $\Delta$(cantor set itself) rather than $\mathbb{R}$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ let me clarify your question: we know that the cantor set is closed in $[0,1]$ as well as in $\mathbb{R}$. But, in which set you want to show that it is open also? $\endgroup$ – Groups Sep 29 '15 at 6:23
  • $\begingroup$ I want to show that cantor set intersecting [0,1/3] is open in cantor set. $\endgroup$ – metricspace Sep 29 '15 at 6:31
5
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a metric space; let $A \subset X$; let $B \subset A$; then $B$ is called open (resp. closed) in $A$ if and only if there is some $C$ open (resp. closed) in $X$ such that $B = C \cap A$. From this definition it follows that the Cantor set is clopen in itself.

However, the Cantor set is not clopen in $\mathbb{R}$, as you have remarked.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So C is this case could be an open interval like say (-1/2, 1/2), and A would just be the cantor set. B is the intersection in question, right? $\endgroup$ – metricspace Sep 29 '15 at 6:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes; moreover, we know that every metric subspace is clopen in itself. :) $\endgroup$ – Megadeth Sep 29 '15 at 6:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.