1
$\begingroup$

Is it possible to define a Cauchy sequence as follows?

Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space and $(x_{n})_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ be a sequence in it. Then $(x_{n})_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ is Cauchy iff $\lim_{(j,k)\to (\infty,\infty) }d(x_{j},x_{k})=0$.

Thanks.

Note: By $\lim_{(j,k)\to (\infty,\infty) }d(x_{j},x_{k})=0$, I mean the standard definition of the limit for a function $d:\mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ using Euclidean metric $ d_{E}$.

Note2: Thanks for the answers. Conclusion: It can be defined as a double limit indeed, as indicated by http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=lZU0CAH4RccC&pg=PA34&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false page 33.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What precisely is meant by $\lim_{(x,y)\to(\infty,\infty)}f(x,y)=L$, here? $\endgroup$ – Cameron Buie May 13 '12 at 21:50
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Yes, assuming that your definition of $\lim\limits_{(j,k)\to(\infty,\infty)}f(j,k)=L$ is that for each $\epsilon>0$ there is $n_0\in\Bbb N$ such that $|f(j,k)-L|<\epsilon$ whenever $j,k\ge n_0$. $\endgroup$ – Brian M. Scott May 13 '12 at 21:51
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, that's what I meant. $\endgroup$ – firemind May 14 '12 at 3:26
1
$\begingroup$

You have to define properly the double limit $(j,k) \to (\infty, \infty)$. We can take $j=k \to \infty$ and clearly $d(x_j,x_k)=d(x_j,x_j)=0$ but $(x_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ doesn't necessarily converges (take $x_{2n} = 3 , x_{2n+1} = 5$ for example).

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

If you look carefully you need to define what the limit means, is well known that the distance is a continuous map while endowing space $X\times X$ with a certain topology. In this case all its ok and your definition it is equivalent.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.