0
$\begingroup$

Let $(X, Y)$ be a random vector with density $f(x,y) = c I_A(x,y)$ where $A=\{(x,y): 0<x^2<y<1\}$. $I_A$ is a characteristic function.

I need to simulate random data with this pdf.

It is possible generate samples from this distribution using the PDF?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "pdf" is a pretty standard abbreviation for "probability density function". $\endgroup$ – Ian Sep 20 '15 at 21:30
  • $\begingroup$ Probability density function $\endgroup$ – albert Sep 20 '15 at 21:30
  • $\begingroup$ $I_A$ presumably means the indicator function of $A$. $\endgroup$ – Ian Sep 20 '15 at 21:32
2
$\begingroup$

In the rejection approach, you draw from a distribution which is not the one that you want, and then you reject points in such a way as to get to the correct distribution. Here you can sample uniformly from the square $(0,1) \times (0,1)$ and then reject a point $(x,y)$ whenever $x^2 \geq y$. (This assumes your problem is confined to the square $(0,1) \times 0,1)$; everything goes through the same if it instead confined to the rectangle $(-1,1) \times (0,1)$.)

In principle, you can make a faster method than this by computing the marginal distribution of (say) $X$, sampling $X$ using this marginal distribution, and then sampling $Y$ as $U(X^2,1)$. (Here it may help to know how to sample from a distribution given a CDF: Generation of random variable from a complicated CDF may be helpful.)

But even in this simple example, it is hard to invert the marginal CDF of $X$. In this case it is $\frac{3}{2} (x-x^3/3)$, so there is an analytic solution, but it is rather complicated. It would probably be faster to use Newton's method to compute a numerical solution than it would be to compute the analytic solution. So having fallback methods like the rejection method is very useful.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In the rejection approach, it might be necessary to replace $(0,1)\times(0,1)$ by $(-1,1)\times(0,1)$. In the "simpler and faster approach", uniformly sampling $x$ is a bad idea since the density of $x$ is not constant but proportional to $1-x^2$. $\endgroup$ – Did Sep 20 '15 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ @Did You're right, I've edited. $\endgroup$ – Ian Sep 20 '15 at 21:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.