5
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be real symmetric $n\times n$ matrix whose only eigenvalues are $0$ and $1$. Let the dimension of the null space of $A-I$ be $m$. Pick out the true statements.

  1. The characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(\lambda-1)^m(\lambda)^{m-n}$.

  2. $A^k = A^{k+1}$

  3. The rank of $A$ is $m$.

This is what I did: I found geometric multiplicity corresponding to eigenvalue value $0$ to be $n-m$(using symmetric matrix is diagonalizable ) while geometric multiplicity of eigenvalue value 1 is $m$(that is given) .so the characteristic polynomial of $A$ should be $(\lambda-1)^m(\lambda)^{n-m}$. While I am not sure about other two statements. Any kind of help is highly appreciated. Thanks.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think you are right. $\endgroup$ – Marso May 12 '12 at 13:38
3
$\begingroup$

As you noticed, since $A$ is a real symmetric matrix, it is diagonalizable, and the properties satisfied (or not) by $A$ will be satisfied also by $D$, where $D$ is a diagonal matrix which consists of the eigenvalues of $A$. Indeed, $\dim\ker(A-I)$ and characteristic polynomial are invariant up a change of basis. To see that, write $A=P^{-1}DP$, and $\ker(A-I)=\ker(D-I)$, as it can be seen by a double inclusion. For the characteristic polynomial, use determinant for example.

  • The first is true if we switch $m$ and $n$ in the power of $\lambda$, namely $p_A(\lambda)=(\lambda-1)^m\lambda^{n-m}$, otherwise the degree would be $2m-n$, which is not $m$, except in the case $m=n$.
  • The second is false if $k=0$ unless $A=I$, but true for $k\geq 1$.
  • The third is also true. Indeed, we look at the rank of $A$ is the same as the rank of $D$, and the rank of a diagonal matrix is easy to determine.
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry sir i didn't get $dimker(A−I)$ and characteristic polynomial are invariant up a change of basis. $\endgroup$ – srijan May 12 '12 at 13:17
  • $\begingroup$ And why third is true? Can you explain please? $\endgroup$ – srijan May 12 '12 at 13:18
  • $\begingroup$ How second statement is true for all $k\geq 1$ ? Can you explain sir? $\endgroup$ – srijan May 12 '12 at 13:24
  • $\begingroup$ First show that it's enough to show it for $D$. $\endgroup$ – Davide Giraudo May 12 '12 at 13:25
  • $\begingroup$ Dear sir i got all the points you made except for the first statement. My observation is characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(\lambda-1)^m(\lambda)^{n-m}$. Does it make no difference ? $\endgroup$ – srijan May 12 '12 at 13:57
2
$\begingroup$

To answer 2 and 3, consider diagonalizing $A$. And note that it is enough to show 2 for $k=1$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Dear sir what i have observed is correct or not? $\endgroup$ – srijan May 12 '12 at 13:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.