4
$\begingroup$

Let $\;g:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb{C}\,$ be a function of bounded variation.

Let $\;f:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb{C}\,$ be a function Riemann-integrable along $g$.

Define $\,\alpha\left(x\right) = V_a^x \left(g\right)$, for all $\,x\in\left[a,b\right]$.

How do I prove that $\displaystyle\,\left\lvert\,\int f \,dg\, \right\rvert \leq \int \big\lvert\, f\, \big\rvert \,d\alpha$?

I have proven it for the case $\,g\,$ is monotonic, but in general how do I prove it?

Set $\,g=h+ik\,$ where $\,h,k\,$ are reals.

Then, set $\,h_1\left(x\right)=1/2\big(V_a^x\left(h\right) +h\left(x\right)\big)\, $ and $\,h_2\left(x\right)=1/2\big(V_a^x\left(h\right) - h\left(x\right)\big)\,$ and $\,k_1\left(x\right) = 1/2\big(V_a^x \left(k\right) +k\left(x\right)\big)\,$ and $\,k_2\left(x\right) = 1/2\big(V_a^x \left(k\right) - k\left(x\right)\big)$.

Then, \begin{align} \left\lvert\int_a^b f \,dg \right\rvert & = \left\lvert\int_a^b f \,dh_1 - \int_a^b f\, dh_2 + i\left(\int_a^b f\, dk_1 -\int_a^b f \,dk_2\right) \right\rvert \\ & \leq \left\lvert\int_a^b f \,dh_1 \right\rvert + \left\lvert\int_a^b f \,dh_2 \right\rvert + \left\lvert\int_a^b f\, dk_1 \right\rvert + \left\lvert\int_a^b f \,dk_2 \right\rvert \\ & \leq \int_a^b \big\lvert\, f\, \big\rvert \,dh_1 + \int_a^b \big\lvert\, f\, \big\rvert\,dh_2 + \int_a^b \big\lvert\, f\, \big\rvert\,dk_1 + \int_a^b \big\lvert\, f\, \big\rvert \,dk_2 \\ & = \int_a^b \big\lvert \,f\left(x\right) \big\rvert \,dV_a^x(h) + \int_a^b \big\lvert \,f\left(x\right)\big\rvert\,dV_a^x\left(k\right) \\ & = \int_a^b \big\lvert \,f\left(x\right)\big\rvert \, d\big( V_a^x\left(h\right) + V_a^x \left(k\right) \big). \end{align}

However, $\,V_a^x\left(h\right)+ V_a^x\left(k\right)\geq V_a^x\left(g\right)\,$ for all $\,x$, we cannot relate the above inequalities to prove the inequality in question.

How do I prove it? Thank you in advance.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It may be helpful to include the definition of $V_a^x$ in your question. Is it $\mu (\{t : x>g(t)>a\}$ or what? $\endgroup$ – PVAL-inactive Sep 15 '15 at 23:29
  • $\begingroup$ @PVAL $V_a^b(f)$ means the total variation of $f$ on $[a,b]$. I assume $f$ is Riemann-integrable, I don't mean Lebesgue measurable. $\endgroup$ – Rubertos Sep 15 '15 at 23:31
  • $\begingroup$ I'm sorry I haven't seen this stuff in a while. That is definitely something you shouldn't need to define. $\endgroup$ – PVAL-inactive Sep 15 '15 at 23:47
0
$\begingroup$

Lemma

Let $g:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ be of bounded variation and $f:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ be Riemann-Stieltjes integrable along $g$.

Then, for every $\epsilon>0$, there exists a partition $P$ of $[a,b]$ such that every refinement $Q:=\{x_0,...,x_n\}$ of $P$ and $\mu\in \prod_{i=1}^n [x_{i-1},x_i]$, $|\int_a^b f dg - \sum_{i=1}^n f(\mu_i) (g(x_i)-g(x_{i-1}))|<\epsilon$.

The proof for lemma is simple. Start with a case [$f$:real, $g$:monotone] then [$f$:real, $g$:real bounded variation] then [$f$:complex, $g$:real bounded variation] them [$f$:complex, $g$:complex bounded variation].

To start a proof for the original question, fix $\epsilon$.

Then, there exists partitions such that $|\int f dg - \sum f(\mu_i) (g(x_i) -g(x_{i-1}))|<\epsilon$ and $|\int |f| dV_a^x(g) - \sum |f(\mu_i)| V_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}(g) |<\epsilon$ respectively.

Now, take the common refinement of these partitions.

Then, $|\int f dg |< \epsilon + |\sum f(\mu_i) (g(x_i)- g(x_{i-1}))| \leq \epsilon + \sum |f(\mu_i)| |g(x_i) - g(x_{i-1})| \leq \epsilon + \sum f(\mu_i) V_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}(g) < 2\epsilon + \int |f| dV_a^x (g)$.

This proves it.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.