0
$\begingroup$

What is the best way to solve the system of following trigonometric equations with respect to $w_l, w_r, b_l, b_r$?

$$ F_x=w_l^2sin(b_l)+w_r^2sin(b_r) $$ $$ F_z=w_l^2cos(b_l)+w_r^2cos(b_r) $$ $$ M_x=w_r^2cos(b_r)-w_l^2cos(b_l) $$ $$ M_y=w_l^2sin(b_l)+w_r^2sin(b_r) $$ $$ M_z=w_r^2sin(b_r)-w_l^2sin(b_l) $$ I need to find relation between $w_l, w_r, b_l, b_r$ and symbolic coefficients $F_x,F_z,M_x,M_y,M_z$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ May I clarify if you are looking to express $w_l, w_r, b_l, b_r$ in terms of $F_x, F_z, M_x, M_y, M_z$? $\endgroup$ – Yiyuan Lee Sep 12 '15 at 12:59
  • $\begingroup$ Do you have $F_x=M_y$ or is there a typo? $\endgroup$ – David Quinn Sep 12 '15 at 13:00
  • $\begingroup$ @LeeYiyuan yes It shouldn't be all 5 coefficients, of course. As there are only 4 unknowns and 5 equations. $\endgroup$ – Andrew Sep 12 '15 at 13:03
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidQuinn It is not a typo. The full version of equations looks like $M_y/h*k_f$, but i replaced this with $M_y$ to simplify. $\endgroup$ – Andrew Sep 12 '15 at 13:07
0
$\begingroup$

Note that $$F_z + M_x = 2w_r^2\cos b_r$$ $$F_x + M_z = 2w_r^2\sin b_r$$

thus for $b_r$ and $w_r$ we have (dividing one equation by another, using $\sin ^2 \theta + \cos^2 \theta = 1$):

$$\tan b_r = \frac{F_x + M_z}{F_z + M_x}$$

$$4w_r^4 = (F_x + M_z)^2 + (F_z + M_x)^2$$


Note also that

$$F_z - M_x = 2w_l^2\cos b_l$$ $$F_x - M_z = 2w_1^2\sin b_l$$

thus for $b_l$ and $w_l$ we have

$$\tan b_l = \frac{F_x - M_z}{F_z - M_x}$$ $$ 4w_l^4 = (F_x - M_z)^2 + (F_z - M_x)^2$$

(As mentioned in the comments by OP, $M_y$ turns out to be unused indeed.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. Actually this is simplified version of full model with first and second differential terms, and few other forces and moments. But since they are only 1/10 of the full force/torque vectors so i omitted them in simplified model shown above. This model will be used in microcontroller's closed loop, so it must be as simple as possible to guarantee fast response. $\endgroup$ – Andrew Sep 12 '15 at 13:22
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps $w_l, w_r, b_l, b_r$ can indeed be expressed even more easily in terms of the components of the other 9/10 vectors. However, with just these components available, I think the representation given is rather simple indeed. $\endgroup$ – Yiyuan Lee Sep 12 '15 at 13:28
0
$\begingroup$

If you ignore the fourth equation, since $F_x$ and $ M_y$ are identical, then number the remaining equations 1-4:

Take successively the sum of equations 1 and 4,and the difference of 1 and 4.

Call these equations A and B. Do the same operations on equations 2 and 3, call these C and D.

Now dividing B and D gives $$\tan \beta_l=\frac{F_x-M_z}{F_z-M_x}$$ Squaring and adding the same gives $$4\omega_l^4=(F_x-M_z)^2+(F_z-M_x)^2$$

Now do the same set of operations on equations A and C and you're done.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.