83
$\begingroup$

I was just wondering why we have 90° degrees for a perpendicular angle. Why not 100° or any other number?

What is the significance of 90° for the perpendicular or 360° for a circle?

I didn't ever think about this during my school time.

Can someone please explain it mathematically? Is it due to some historical reason?

$\endgroup$
13
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ There is no mathematical reason. Although according to Wikipedia even the historical reason for it is unclear. $\endgroup$
    – froggie
    May 8, 2012 at 16:55
  • 18
    $\begingroup$ It's a Babylonian convention that we divide a circle into $360^\circ$. For a while, there was the grad measure where a right angle is 100 grads, but it seems to have never caught on. Of course, all the cool kids use radians nowadays. $\endgroup$
    – J. M. ain't a mathematician
    May 8, 2012 at 16:56
  • 16
    $\begingroup$ There has been speculation that it is because $360$ is a "nice" number close to the length of the year in days. Angles (or with greater historical accuracy, arcs of circles) had their primary application in astronomy/astrology. $\endgroup$
    – André Nicolas
    May 8, 2012 at 17:02
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ It's worth looking at other cases where we divide a single unit into multiple units, particularly the non-metric units, like 12 inches in a foot, 24 hours in a day, etc. These numbers are, in a sense, arbitrary ways of dividing up a unit, and we often see lots of multiples of small primes in these numbers, so we can frequently get fractions of a unit as integers of another - $1/6$ of a day is $4$ hours, for example. $\endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    May 8, 2012 at 18:14
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ yep, there are 400 grads in a circle! This is why you have D/R/G modes on many calculators. $\endgroup$
    – Ronald
    May 9, 2012 at 0:06

6 Answers 6

Reset to default
70
$\begingroup$

360 is an incredibly abundant number, which means that there are many factors. So it makes it easy to divide the circle into $2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12,\ldots$ parts. By contrast, 400 gradians cannot even be divided into 3 equal whole-number parts. While this may not necessarily be why 360 was chosen in the first place, it could be one of the reasons we've stuck with the convention.

By the way, when working in radians, we just "live with" the fact that most common angles are fractions involving $\pi$. There's a small group of people who prefer to use a constant called $\tau$, which is just $2\pi$. Then angles seem naturally to be divisions of the circle: The angle that divides a circle into $n$ equal parts is $\tau/n$ (radians).

Hope this helps!

$\endgroup$
12
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ +1 for \tau! (And as you said, the real question should be why did we use 2\pi in radians? ) $\endgroup$
    – Zenon
    May 9, 2012 at 0:44
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Zenon, the circumference of a circle is $2\pi r$. If you like the formula for the arclength $s=r\theta$, then you would choose $\theta=2\pi$ for one revolution. $\endgroup$
    – JRN
    May 9, 2012 at 10:06
  • 11
    $\begingroup$ @JoelReyesNoche Yes of course, but then why didn't we start with the circumference being $\tau$r? Tau manifesto $\endgroup$
    – Zenon
    May 9, 2012 at 15:54
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Possibly, besides the fact that 360 is divisible by 2,3,4,5,6, it may have also been chosen historically because it is close to the number of days in an year, and therefore a "meaningful" number when dealing with circles (for Aristotle, any motion "in the heavens" was supposed to be circular) $\endgroup$
    – Dalker
    May 20, 2012 at 17:58
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ It's always seemed to me that turns are the most natural unit of angles. $\endgroup$
    – Doug McClean
    May 14, 2013 at 14:50
13
$\begingroup$

I have heard that the ancient Babylonians used a base-$60$ numeral system with sub-base $10$.

Certainly such a system was used by Ptolemy in the second century AD. See Gerald Toomer's translation of Ptolemy's Almagest. In particular Ptolemy divided the circle into $360$ degrees. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemy%27s_table_of_chords, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almagest, and http://hypertextbook.com/eworld/chords.shtml .

$\endgroup$
1
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ My guess is that the Babylonian system is the main reason for that. It is also worth noting that the smallest regular polygon has all its angles equal to 60 degrees; historically the choice might have been made first for the equilateral triangle... $\endgroup$
    – N. S.
    May 8, 2012 at 19:51
11
$\begingroup$

Ancient civilizations had used a system of counting numbers with fingers on their palms. Later they found it is easier to count higher numbers with their fingers only but with the folds of their fingers on their palm to 12 excluding the thumb. Further by folding each finger of the other hand they counted up to 60, that is 12 multiplied by 5. Old sailors from Greece and southern Europe used to count with their fingers only in a similar way. Still many people around the world practice this. British count and measuring system is based on 12 and 60. A solar day consists of 2 distinct parts; the day - time in light, and the night - time in dark, due to rotation of Earth on its axis and falling sunlight. A day time is divided in to 12 parts as one can count it with his finger folds of a hand represented for day. A night time is similarly divided by his finger folds of the other hand represented for night. Thus one get a sidereal day consist of 24 hours. An hour is divided by 60 to count a smaller portion of an hour and further a minute is divided by 60 to get a second. Ancient people knew that climatic conditions were changing and repeating in about 360 days, by observing natural events like migration of birds, mating season of animals, flowering of trees etc. They divided it in to 4 equal portions by naming seasons. When they started cultivation and harvesting they needed a calendar consisting of 4 seasons contained in 360 days year. By observing the stars position they knew it came back every 360 days. Around 4000 years ago the observers and mathematicians of that time started thinking of the Earth being a spherical mass which spins its own and revolves around the sun, they related the number 360 to a circle and and started to count a smaller portion of a circle to be one in 360 parts (called one degree). Thus the degree of a circle or the measurement of angles are in a way related to our fingers and its folds of our palm.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Where did you get this information? It makes sense, but would be helpful to see a primary source if one exists :). I have never seen this in real life which I why I'm curious. $\endgroup$
    – Lance
    Jan 17, 2016 at 16:29
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ can you provide a source please ? $\endgroup$
    – yoyo_fun
    Dec 14, 2016 at 13:07
7
$\begingroup$

It is from ancient astronomy. A day in earth is a natural unit of time, and one year is also a natural time unit. one year is 360 days in ancient calendar, People related to circle to year, therefore a circle is divided to 360 degrees. There is not much free choices here if we establish this relationship.

The accepted answer can explain why people choose 360 over 365, but cannot explain why a circle is not 720 or 3600.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

In military (well, I don't know if this is true for all countries), a full turn of a circle is 6400' (I don't know the translation of "milésimos", thousandth?).

This has the advantages already mentioned (divisible by 2, 3, 4, ...) and they can easily use it to measure things. 1 milésimo is about 1 meter at 1 km. So, if they know that a target is at about 1 km and it has 3 milésimos, the target is about 3 meters wide. They use it the other way round too. For example, a tank is about 7-8 meters by 2-3 meters. If they see a tank with their binocular and measure about 7 milésimos, they know that the tank is about 1 km away.

They have several ways to measure milésimos, from graduated binocular to "rules of thumb".

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You mean the mil? A very convenient unit, especially for sniping purposes... $\endgroup$
    – J. M. ain't a mathematician
    May 14, 2013 at 17:43
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, you can see a picture there using one's hand to measure. $\endgroup$
    – Nico
    May 14, 2013 at 17:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ When I did my conscript duty a full circle was 6000? $\endgroup$
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    Sep 4, 2014 at 17:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It seems there are many different definitions, depending on the country, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… $1/6400$ for NATO countries, $1/6000$ Soviet Union and Finnland, $1/6300$ (wtf) Sweden $\endgroup$
    – flawr
    Sep 5, 2014 at 19:13
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Note: 6400 is not divisible by 3 .... -- @flawr: 6300 is a better approximation to $1000\cdot 2\pi$ than 6400 or 6000. These units are apparently all meant to approximate a milliradian. $\endgroup$
    – hmakholm left over Monica
    Dec 26, 2014 at 1:56
1
$\begingroup$

360 degrees is not the only choice. When using grads (also called gons) as a unit of angle, the full circle is 400 degrees and the right angle is 100 degrees. Grads are used in surveying and for example a theodolite, a surveying instrument, often has its measuring scale labeled in grads. It seems the unit was introduced along the metric system in an attempt to replace historical units, but only caught on in some fields.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .