0
$\begingroup$

I have a question, raised form kinetic theory (pure mathematical). Imagine, that $\Psi (\overrightarrow{r},\overrightarrow{p},t)$ - sufficiently smooth function, where $\overrightarrow{r}$ - radius vector, $\overrightarrow{p}$ - unit vector of orientation, $t$ - time.

Can someone explain me, how to proove this identities (I think, Stoke's theorem must be used here):

$$ \int_{S} \overrightarrow{p} \left(\nabla_p \cdot \left( \frac {d\overrightarrow{p}} {dt} \Psi\right) \right)d\overrightarrow{p}=-\int_{S} \frac {d\overrightarrow{p}} {dt} \Psi d\overrightarrow{p} $$

$$ \int_{S} \nabla_p \cdot \left( \frac {d\overrightarrow{p}} {dt} \Psi\right) d\overrightarrow{p}=0 $$

Here $S$ is the surface of the unit sphere, so we integrate over a unit sphere.

This formula are used in physical article. I am sure, that you don't need more information for this identities.

Edit: If this is simple Integration by parts, I am interested, what boundary term is, and why it is zero

$\endgroup$
8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ hint: integration by parts $\endgroup$
    – tired
    Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 19:39
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I figured that. Can you explain me, why boundary term disappears? I don't know, what boundary is here $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 19:44
  • $\begingroup$ I have an explanation that avoids differential geometry in the appendix of this article: faculty.missouri.edu/~stephen/preprints/pde-sphere.html $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 19:48
  • $\begingroup$ But if you want to use Stoke's Theorem, the clever thing is that on the surface of the sphere, the boundary is the empty set. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 19:49
  • $\begingroup$ You said that $\vec p$ is a unit vector. Is that correct? And, what is the relevance or $\vec r$ then? $\endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Commented Sep 3, 2015 at 19:51

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .