My young son was asked to derive the surface area of a sphere using pure algebra. He could not get to the right formula but it seems that his reasoning is right. Please tell me what's wrong with his logic.
He reasons as follows:
- 1.Slice a sphere into thin circles (or rings if you hollow them out)
- The sum of the circumferences of all the circles forms the surface area of the sphere.
- Since the formula of circumference is $2{\pi}R$, the sum of the circumferences would be $2{\pi}(R_1+R_2+R_3+...+R_n)$
- My son draws the radii beside each other and concludes that their sum would be equivalent to one-half of the area of the largest circle or $({\pi}R^2)/2$. He appears to be right from his drawing.
- Substituting the sum of the radii, he comes up with a formula for the surface area of the sphere as $(R^2)*(\pi^2)$.
- He asks me what's wrong with his procedure that he cannot derive the correct formula of $4{\pi}R^2$.