0
$\begingroup$

$\begin{pmatrix} 7 & -2\\2 & 2 \end{pmatrix}$

The eigenvalues for this matrix are $\lambda=6$ and $\lambda=3$

It also happens that $(A-6I)(A-3I)=0$

I've checked for various $2$ x $2$ matrices. If a matrix has eigenvalues $\lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ then $(A-\lambda_1 I)(A-\lambda_2 I)=0$. Even when they're not distinct this works. I cant show this however. I have tried for a $3$ x $3$ as well- pick any two distinct and it will work. However I have found a counterexample for which it doesnt work when they're not distinct. Is this result true? Why? Simple algebra for $2$ x $2$ case does not seem to yield it. What about for $n$ x $n$?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You may want to study the notion of $characteristic$ $polynomial$ of a matrix. $\endgroup$ – uniquesolution Sep 1 '15 at 21:21
2
$\begingroup$

The Cayley-Hamilton theorem says that if $p$ is the characteristic polynomial of a matrix $A$, then $p(A) = 0$. Because $A$ commutes with itself and $I$, you can factor this matrix polynomial just like its scalar equivalent. In 2 dimensions, you are just reproducing this fact, since you are including both roots. In 3 dimensions, however, you have been trying to get by with only two of the three roots, so it is hardly surprising you have found exceptions. I t is just luck, though, that you haven't yet found an counter-example with two distinct eigenvalues. You will find one in the matrix $$\begin{pmatrix} 1 && 0 && 0\\0 && 2 && 0\\0 && 0 && 3\end{pmatrix}$$ for example.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.