0
$\begingroup$

I'm reading the proof of the proposition that states that every minimizing curve is a geodesics when it is given an unit speed parametrization.

In the proof appears the following quantity : $$ \delta J= \epsilon \sum_{\alpha }\int_{t_0}^t\big[\frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot{x}^\alpha}(\phi(t), \phi(t)')-\int_{t_0}^t\frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot{x}^\alpha}(\phi(t), \phi(t)') dr\big] \dot{\psi}^\alpha(t) dt.$$

(with $f:(a,b)\rightarrow X$ continuous, $\phi:[t_0,t_1]\rightarrow U\subset X$, with $X$ Riemannian manifold of dim $n$, of class $C^2$ s.t. $\phi(t_0)=x_0$ and $\phi(t_1)=x_1$)

Then it is said that :

$\delta J=0$ $\forall \psi$ with $\psi: [t_0,t_1]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n$ of class $C^2$ s.t. $\psi(t_0)=\psi(t_1)=0$

is equivalent to

$$\big[\frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot{x}^\alpha}(\phi(t), \phi(t)')-\int_{t_0}^t\frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot{x}^\alpha}(\phi(t), \phi(t)') dr\big]=cost$$ for every $\alpha=1,...,n$.

Why can I say this? Is it a theorem in calculus of variation?

I know the following lemma: if $f\in L^1_{loc}$ $$\int_a^b f(x) \phi(x)' dx=0 $$ for every $\phi\in C^1_0(I)$ than $f(x)=cost$ a.e.

Is the assertion mentioned above a consequence of a generalization of this lemma? (The thing that confuses me is that there is a summation over $\alpha$ and this index appears also in $\dot{\psi}^\alpha$).

Thanks for the help!

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Yes, precisely, it is a generalization of your lemma. Note that your lemma implies that if: $$ \sum_i \int_a^b f_i(x)\, \phi_i'(x)\,dx =0\,, $$

then all the $f_i$ are constant almost everywhere.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thanks for your answer...but why have I this implication? Is there because $\sum_i \int_a^b f_i(x)\, \phi_i'(x)\,dx =0$ implies $\int_a^b f_i(x) \, \phi_i'(x)\,dx$ for every $i$? But why should all these integrals be positive? Thank you very much! $\endgroup$ – Gggl. Sep 2 '15 at 8:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The key is: the integral must be zero for every such $\phi_i$. So the only possibility is that the $f_i$ have all zero weak derivatives, i.e. they are constant a.e.. $\endgroup$ – geodude Sep 2 '15 at 9:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.