-3
$\begingroup$

So the Goldbach conjecture says 'Every even integer greater than 2 can be written as sum of two primes'. Here is what I have roughly done to verify it, using probability. I don't say it is correct but I just want to show it.

Let a be an even integer greater than 2. The prime counting function gives number of primes n as n ~ a/ln a. Now, for every prime less than a, we generate odd numbers(except for 2)

a-p(i) where, p(i) is the ith prime below a. Thus, we have approximately n odd numbers below a.

We have n/a = 1/lna which gives the probability of prime number below a.

If we consider only the odd numbers below a, the probability becomes 2/lna, which means 2 out of lna odd numbers below a are prime numbers.

But we have generated approximately(which just excludes case for 2 and is negligible for large numbers) a/lna odd numbers.

So, from unitary method, 2/lna out of 1 odd numbers below a are prime, which yields for our case, $ 2 a/(lna)^2$ prime numbers out of a/lna odd numbers generated.

And we can see that, 2 a/(lna)^2 is obviously greater than 1 which even grows when a gets larger.

This shows that, among our generated odd numbers(a-p(i)) there is at least one prime number q giving,

a-p(i) = q

or, p(i) + q = a. where p(i) and q are primes, verifying Goldbach Conjecture.

Edit: I just wanted to know what is wrong with this approach(I knew there was). And I got my answer too. Thank you.

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by Daniel, user147263, graydad, Matt Samuel, Strants Aug 30 '15 at 6:06

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ possible duplicate of Goldbach conjecture $\endgroup$ – Morgan Rodgers Aug 29 '15 at 12:29
  • $\begingroup$ i could not understand the question you mentioned. $\endgroup$ – Bibekpandey Aug 29 '15 at 13:13
  • $\begingroup$ There are like 30 "check my proof of the Goldbach conjecture" questions..... $\endgroup$ – Morgan Rodgers Aug 29 '15 at 14:39
  • $\begingroup$ @BeWakePandey It isn't clear what your question is. You give a crude heuristic which could be refined to a sharp heuristic, and though neither is proven. What type of answer are you expecting that you'd accept?? As it stands, there isn't any question in your question. $\endgroup$ – Erick Wong Aug 30 '15 at 1:53
  • $\begingroup$ Use anything but $e$, because $e$ is already universally defined. $\endgroup$ – user253055 Sep 2 '15 at 0:08
1
$\begingroup$

On average, you would expect around $2e/(\log e)^2$ primes. But the $e/\log e$ numbers are a small proportion of the numbers below $e$, and it might happen, for one particular $e$, that none of them are prime.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ but 2e/(log e)^2 is greater than 1 always, should not that mean by plain probability that there is at least 1 prime favouring GC? $\endgroup$ – Bibekpandey Aug 29 '15 at 13:08
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ No. If you toss a coin three times, the number of heads will average to 3/2. But sometimes you will get no heads. $\endgroup$ – Empy2 Aug 29 '15 at 13:11
  • $\begingroup$ yeah, that's true. $\endgroup$ – Bibekpandey Aug 29 '15 at 13:15
  • $\begingroup$ and by the way, has it been proven that GC can't be proven or disproven?? $\endgroup$ – Bibekpandey Aug 29 '15 at 13:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @BeWakePandey If it had been proven that GC can't be disproven, that would amount to a proof that it's true, since any counterexample would become a trivial disproof. $\endgroup$ – Erick Wong Aug 30 '15 at 1:49

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.