0
$\begingroup$

In some derivation I arrived to I had reached the following assuming $\alpha,\beta >0$ $$\max\{1,1+\beta \}\leq \max\{\alpha,\alpha+\beta\}$$

Obviously the following condition can be deduced $$1\leq\alpha$$

Is there any other condition? Thanks

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Notice that $\forall x\in \Bbb R\;\Big[\max\{x, x+\beta\} = x+\max\{0, \beta\}\Big]$ so the assumption $\alpha, \beta > 0$ is not even required. $\endgroup$ – Graham Kemp Aug 25 '15 at 0:50
2
$\begingroup$

$\max\{1,1+\beta\}=1+\beta$ and $\max\{\alpha,\alpha+\beta\}=\alpha+\beta$. Thus, the inequality you have reached is $$1+\beta\le\alpha+\beta$$ which is equivalent to $$1\le\alpha$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I have edited my question... $\endgroup$ – Henry Aug 25 '15 at 0:45
  • $\begingroup$ I'm sorry. My former answer meant that some information about $\beta$ was needed, but I was wrong: the meaning of the inequality does not depend on $\beta$ (if $\beta$ were negative it would be easy to show the same conclusion: $1\le \alpha$). $\endgroup$ – ajotatxe Aug 25 '15 at 1:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.