1
$\begingroup$

$$ \int \int_S (x^2+y^2)d\sigma$$

Where S is the unit sphere centered at (0,0,0), and $\sigma$ is surface area.

I arrived at the correct answer of $\large \frac{8\pi}{3}$, but I took an (educated?) guess on the set-up of the integral.

Instead of the usual volume element of the sphere, in spherical coordinates,

$$dV=\rho^2sin(\phi)d\rho d\theta d\phi$$

I just simply omitted the $\rho^2 d\rho$ factor of the Jacobian and guessed that the remaining factor $$sin(\phi) d\theta d\phi$$

represents the "surface area element" of the sphere.

Integration gave me the correct answer, and I didn't have to think about the tricky ndS factor to compute.

Is my work ok - or did I arrive at the correct answer with a wrong method?

Any suggestions or alternative solutions are welcome -- especially if you would like to comment on the computation of the n.dS factor in this problem.

EDIT: I think I may have completely missed the point of the question, too. My trying to get an n.dS factor is only relevant for flux integrals of vector fields. This question is an "ordinary" double integral over the surface area of a sphere -- it is not considered a "surface integral". Do I have it correct now? So, what I really should be doing is to compute a Jacobian determinant factor. But would the Jacobian be a determinant of a 2x2 matrix or 3x3? I feel that if I compute it for a 3x3 matrix, then I am computing the Jacobian determinant for a volume integral, and not an surface area integral -- which is a bit confusing.

Thanks,

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Using spherical coordinates as follows $$y=r\sin\theta\cos\phi$$ $$x=r\sin\theta\sin\phi$$ $$d\sigma=\text{Elementary surface area of sphere}$$$$=(r\sin\theta d\phi)(rd\theta)=r^2\sin\theta d\theta d\phi$$

Now, $$\int\int_S(x^2+y^2)d\sigma$$ $$=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}(r^2\sin^2\theta\cos^2\phi+r^2\sin^2\theta\sin^2\phi)r^2\sin\theta d\theta d\phi$$ $$=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}(r^2\sin^2\theta(\cos^2\phi+\sin^2\phi))r^2\sin\theta d\theta d\phi$$

$$=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}r^4\sin^3\theta d\theta d\phi$$ $$=r^4\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}\sin^3\theta d\theta d\phi$$ Setting $r=\text{radius of unit sphere}=1$ $$=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\left[\int_{0}^{\pi}\frac{3\sin\theta-\sin 3\theta}{4}d\theta \right]d\phi$$ $$=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\left[-\frac{3}{4}\cos\theta+\frac{1}{12}\cos 3\theta \right]_{0}^{\pi}d\phi$$ $$=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\left[\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{6} \right]d\phi$$ $$=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\left[\frac{4}{3}\right]d\phi$$ $$=\frac{4}{3}\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\phi$$ $$=\frac{4}{3}[\phi]_{0}^{2\pi}$$ $$=\frac{4}{3}[2\pi]=\frac{8\pi}{3}$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi @HarishChandraRajpoot, I think I am getting tripped up in the wording of this problem and have realized my major mistake in thinking: this is an "ordinary" double integral, and we can compute a Jacobian determinant factor and get a surface element. I've been trying this whole time to make sense of trying to find n.dS, but I think n.dS is only for flux integrals, which are surface integrals. Regarding this double integral, we do not even have a vector field to consider. What do you think? Thanks for your time, $\endgroup$ – User001 Aug 22 '15 at 4:45
2
$\begingroup$

The correct surface element for spherical coordinates is given by $dS = \rho^2 \sin \phi \cdot d\theta d\phi$ (whose derivation is widely available, e.g. in textbooks), i.e. the surface element you used is missing a factor of $\rho^2$.

You were asked to integrate over the unit sphere, i.e. $\rho = 1$ everywhere, so in this case your omission of $\rho$ did not have an impact on your answer. (So in fact, the surface element you used is correct--you happened to correctly simplify the expression for $dS$ in this special case!)

If you were asked to integrate over some other shape, say a cylinder (for some reason...), with the coordinates you used, you would have gotten a wrong answer.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi @KenWei -- shouldn't I be trying to set up an n.dS factor? I found my normal vector by taking a cross-product of two derivative vectors, one with respect to the variable $\theta$ and the other with respect to the variable $\phi$. I then get a 3-tuple vector that is normal to the sphere. I then normalized this vector. Now my confusion is: this vector is of course not equal to your factor of $\rho^2 sin(\phi)$. How should I interpret this difference? Thanks, $\endgroup$ – User001 Aug 22 '15 at 4:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, you are integrating a scalar function (unless you are talking about some interpretation of surface area from dot products that I'm not aware of); so n.dS is irrelevant in this case. You may be getting confused with an integral of a vector function, in which case you are looking at integrating (v.n)dS where v is the vector function. $\endgroup$ – Ken Wei Aug 22 '15 at 14:07
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, got it -- thanks for your time, @KenWei :-) $\endgroup$ – User001 Aug 24 '15 at 0:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for?Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.