2
$\begingroup$

Say $u(x,y)=x^2+y^2$. Its gradient at (1,1) is (2,2).

Since I'm sure the gradient is directed towards y=x direction. I set y=x. Then $u(x,y)=2x^2=2y^2$. Now compute the gradient again. It's $\nabla u=(\partial_x u,\partial_y u)=(4x,4y)=(4,4)$. So what goes wrong here?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $\partial_x$ depends on information about how $u$ behaves along the $x$-axis, so it can't be determined just from how $u$ behaves along the line $y = x$. $\endgroup$ – Qiaochu Yuan May 3 '12 at 3:34
  • $\begingroup$ When you set $y = x$, you're not really looking at $u(x,y)$ anymore. Instead, you're really looking at some other function of one variable $g(x)$ which is defined by $g(x) = u(x,x) = x^2 + x^2 = 2x^2$. $\endgroup$ – Jesse Madnick May 3 '12 at 3:47
1
$\begingroup$

Recall the definition of the partial derivatives:

$$\partial_x u(x_0,y_0)=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{u(x_0+h,y_0)-u(x_0,y_0)}{h},$$ and similarly for $\partial_y u$. If you restrict $u$ exclusively to the line $y=x$, then this difference quotient cannot be found. Even if $x_0=y_0$, notice that for all $h\neq 0$, $x_0+h\neq x_0$. Therefore the correct computation of the partial derivative $\partial_x u(x_0,x_0)$ is

$ \begin{align*} \partial_x u(x_0,x_0)&=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{u(x_0+h,x_0)-u(x_0,x_0)}{h}\\ &=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{(x_0+h)^2+x_0^2-2x_0^2}{h}\\ &=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{2x_0h+h^2}{h}\\ &=2x_0, \end{align*}$

and similarly for $\partial_yu(x_0,x_0)$.


You could consider the single variable function $f(x):=u(x,x)$, but that is another story. Its derivative tells you how $u$ changes along the line $y=x$. In fact, $f'(x)$ is $\sqrt 2$ times the directional derivative of $u$ in the direction of the unit vector $(1/\sqrt 2,1/\sqrt 2)$, which can also be computed as $\nabla u(x,x)\cdot (1,1) = 4x$.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks to all. You are all right. Jesse Madnick said $2x^2,2y^2,x^2+y^2$ are just three functions conciding on $y=x$ line. They don't necessarily share derivative information. And Jonas Meyer said if I intended to restrict the function on y=x, the gradient will no longer be meaningful. $\endgroup$ – Tim May 3 '12 at 4:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.