Let $\{f_n\}$ and $f$ be Lebesgue measurable functions on $E$ where $|E|<\infty$. Assume that $f_n\to f$ in measure and $\sup_n\|f_n\|_{L^p(E)}<\infty$ for some $p>1$.

(a) Prove that $f_n$ converges to $f$ in $L^1$ norm.

(b) Show by counterexample that this convergence may no longer hold if you replace the $L^p$ condition with $\sup_n \|f_n\|_{L^1(E)}$.

I can deal with the show by counterexample part. Let $f_n(x)=n\chi_{[0,\frac{1}{n}]}$ and $E=[0,1]$, then $f_n(x)\to 0$ in measure. However, $\int_0^1 f_n(x)-f(x)dx=1$.

I am stuck in proving part (a), I tried to use Egorov theorem, which requires $f_n\to f$ a.e. Since $f_n \to f$ in measure, then there is a subsequence $f_{n_k}$ converge a.e. Then $f_{n_k}$ converges uniformly in a compact set $F$. So $$\int_{E}|f_{n_k}(x)-f(x)|dx=\int_{F}|f_{n_k}(x)-f(x)|dx+\int_{E\backslash F}|f_{n_k}(x)-f(x)|dx$$ By the uniformly convergence of $f_{n_k}$ on $F$, then $\int_{F}|f_{n_k}(x)-f(x)|dx<\epsilon M$.

I have trouble with the $\int_{E\backslash F}|f_{n_k}(x)-f(x)|dx$ part.

$\int_{E\backslash F}|f_{n_k}(x)-f(x)|dx<\|f_{n_k}(x)-f(x)\|_{L^p(E\backslash F)}\|\Bbb{1}\|_{L^q(E\backslash F)}<\epsilon \|f_{n_k}(x)-f(x)\|_{L^p(E\backslash F)} $ by Holder's inequality.

Then how to show $\|f_{n_k}(x)-f(x)\|_{L^p(E\backslash F)}$ is actually bounded by the condition given in the problem? And if $\|f_{n_k}(x)-f(x)\|_{L^p(E\backslash F)}$ is bounded, it only proves the subsequence $f_{n_k}$ converges in $L^1$ norm, how to show the $f_n$ also converges in $L^1$ norm?

Could someone kindly help? Thanks!


You've done the bulk of the work already. To show that $\|f_{n_k} - f \|_{L^p(E \setminus F)}$ is bounded, note that by the triangle (Minkowski's) inequality, $$\|f_{n_k}-f \|_{L^p(E \setminus f)} \leq \|f_{n_k}\|_{L^p(E)} + \|f\|_{L^p(E)}.$$ By Fatou's lemma, $$\|f\|_{L^p(E)}^p = \int_E |f|^p = \int_E \lim\limits_{k \to \infty} |f_{n_k}|^p \leq \liminf\limits_{k \to \infty} \int |f_{n_k}|^p \leq \sup\limits_n \|f_n\|^p < \infty.$$

To take care of the subsequence issue, the following applies in a more general setting, and is quite useful. By what is already shown, we have that any subsequence of $f_n$ has a sub-subsequence that converges to $f$. Thus, the set $\{f_n\}_n$ has compact closure in $L^1$. The following is true: let $(X,d)$ be a compact metric space, and let $\{x_n\}_{n=1}^\infty$ be a sequence in $X$ such that every convergent subsequence of $\{x_n\}$ converges to the same limit $x$. Then $\{x_n\}$ converges to $x$. Proof: suppose not. Then there exists $\epsilon>0$ and a subsequence $\{x_{n_k}\}_{k=1}^\infty$ with $d(x_{n_k},x)>\epsilon$ for all $k$. Since $X$ is compact, $\{x_{n_k}\}$ has a convergent subsequence $\{x_{n_{k_j}}\}_{j=1}^\infty$. But $\{x_{n_{k_j}}\}$ is a convergent subsequence of $\{x_n\}$, and therefore must converge to $x$, contradicting our definition of $\{x_{n_k}\}$. Apply this to the closure of your sequence in $L^1$ to complete the proof.

  • $\begingroup$ Alternatively, note that if $M = \sup_n \|f_n\|_{L^p(E)}$, then by Holder we have $\|f_n\|_{L^1(E)} \le M |E|^{1/q}$. Fatou says we also have $\|f\|_{L^1(E)} \le M |E|^{1/q}$. So if we set $a_n = \|f_n -f\|_{L^1(E)}$, the triangle inequality gives $0 \le a_n \le 2 M |E|^{1/q}$. Now apply the double subsequence lemma described above in the compact metric space $[0, 2M|E|^{1/q}]$, and conclude that $a_n \to 0$. $\endgroup$ Aug 11 '15 at 4:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.