3
$\begingroup$

In my textbook, given a measure space $(\Omega,F,\mu)$, the integration for a non-negative $F$ measurable function $f$ on $E$ is defined as $$\int_E f\ \mathsf d\mu = \sup_{0 \le h \le f} I_E\left( h \right)$$ where $h$ is simple function on $E$, i.e. $$h = \sum_{k = 1}^N {a_k}{\chi _{{E_k}}}\left( x \right)$$ and $${I_E}\left( h \right) = \sum_{k = 1}^N {a_k}\mu \left( {{E_k}} \right).$$

Now the question is to show, using a previous result $I_E(g+h)=I_E(g)+I_E(h)$:

$$\int_E {(f_1 + f_1)\ \mathsf d\mu } = \int_E {f_1\ \mathsf d\mu } + \int_E {f_2\ \mathsf d\mu } $$ where $f_1$ and $f_2$ are all non-negative $F$-measurable functions.

I am able to show $$\int_E \left( {{f_1} + {f_2}} \right)\ \mathsf d\mu \ge \int_E {f_1}\ \mathsf d\mu + \int_E {f_2}\ \mathsf d\mu .$$

Let \begin{align}\int_E {f_1}d\mu &= \sup_{0 \le h \le {f_1}} {I_E}\left( h \right),\\ \int_E {f_2}d\mu &= \sup_{0 \le g \le {f_2}} {I_E}\left( g \right).\end{align}

Define sets \begin{align} A &= \left\{ {{I_E}\left( {u} \right):0 \le u \le {f_1} + {f_2}} \right\},\\ B &= \left\{ {{I_E}\left( h \right) + {I_E}\left( g \right):0 \le h \le {f_1},\;0 \le g \le {f_2}} \right\}\end{align}

It is obvious that $B \subseteq A$ since $$0 \le h+g\le f_1+f_2$$ for any $h,g$ and $$I_E(g+h)=I_E(g)+I_E(h).$$

Thus we have \begin{align}\sup B \le \sup A \Rightarrow \sup B &= \mathop {\sup }\limits_{0 \le h \le {f_1},0 \le g \le {f_2}} \left[ {{I_E}\left( h \right) + {I_E}\left( g \right)} \right]\\ &= \sup\limits_{0 \le h \le {f_1}} {I_E}\left( h \right) + \sup\limits_{0 \le g \le {f_2}} {I_E}\left( g \right)\\ &\le \sup\limits_{0 \le u \le {f_1} + {f_2}} {I_E}\left( {u} \right)\end{align}

But I have difficulty proving the opposite inequality. If I can prove every $u$ can be written as $u=h+g$ for some $h,g$, then the prove is done. But it seems it is hard to prove "every $u$ can be written as $u=h+g$". There could be another way around.

Thank you!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Use $\sup(A+B)=\sup A+\sup B$ $\endgroup$ – Ali Aug 4 '15 at 13:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you've proved the monotone convergence theorem for simple functions, you can prove this using the fact that any non-negative measurable function is the pointwise limit of an increasing sequence of non-negative simple functions. $\endgroup$ – Augustin Aug 4 '15 at 13:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Ali If you could explain in more detail exactly how $\sup(A+B)=\sup A+\sup B$ solves the problem that would be great. I've known this fact about sups for thirty years, but I've never seen how it suffices here. You might read the post: The problem is that if $A$ is the set of simple functions less than $f_1$ and $B$ is the set of simple functions less than $f_2$ then it's simply not clear (and in fact it's not true) that $A+B$ is the set of simple functions less than $f_1+f_2$. $\endgroup$ – David C. Ullrich Aug 4 '15 at 16:32
1
$\begingroup$

Given that the result holds for simple functions, let $f_1$, $f_2$ be nonnegative measurable functions and $\{\varphi_n\}$, $\{\psi_n\}$ be sequences of simple functions such that $\varphi_n\uparrow f_1$ and $\psi_n\uparrow f_2$. Then it is clear that $$\varphi_n+\psi_n\uparrow f_1+f_2$$ and similarly $$ (\varphi_n+\psi_n)\chi_E \uparrow (f_1+f_2)\chi_E$$ for any measurable $E$, so by monotone convergence, \begin{align} \int_E(f_1+f_2)\ \mathsf d\mu &= \int \lim_{n\to\infty} (\varphi_n+\psi_n)\chi_E \ \mathsf d\mu\\ &= \lim_{n\to\infty} \int (\varphi_n+\psi_n)\chi_E \ \mathsf d\mu\\ &= \lim_{n\to\infty} \left(\int \varphi_n\chi_E \ \mathsf d\mu + \int \psi_n\chi_E \ \mathsf d\mu \right)\\ &= \int f_1\chi_E \ \mathsf d\mu + \int f_2\chi_E \ \mathsf d\mu\\ &= \int_E f_1\ \mathsf d\mu + \int_E f_2 \ \mathsf d\mu. \end{align}

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

As has been pointed out, the problem itself has an easy solution using the Monotone Convergence Theorem. It seems wrong that just additivity for the integral should require such a thing, but that's the way it is.

About your comment regarding whether every $u$ is equal to $h+g$: You're exactly right that that's what we need for a simple direct proof. But you shouldn't feel bad that you can't prove this because it's not true.

Say $E=[0,1]$. Let $f_1(x)=x$ and $f_2(x)=1-x$. Then $u=1$ is a possible $u$, but it's not hard to see that there do not exist $h$ and $g$ with $h+g=1$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.