Can you complete the expression $2 \underline{ }\, \underline{ }\, \underline{ } \,\underline{ } 5 = 2015$? 
Can you complete the expression
$2 \underline{ } \, \underline{ }\, \underline{ } \, \underline{ } 5 = 2015$
and make it correct by replacing two underscores with a selection of the operational symbols $+, - , /, \times$ and the other two underscores with digits $0,1,\ldots,9$?

I have been working on this problem for quite a while now where my main strategy has simply been trial and error. However, I still can't seem to find a combination of operational symbols and digits where the result gives me 2015. If this is in fact not possible I would greatly appreciate an explanation and if it is possible, I would greatly appreciate an explanation of how you were able to solve it.
Thank you.
 A: Exactly two underscores must be occupied by operators. Furthermore, no two operators can be placed adjacently, as this would be syntactically meaningless. Hence, there are only three possible arrangements of digit and operator positions:


*

*$2$ # @ # @ $5$

*$2$ @ # @ # $5$

*$2$ @ # # @ $5$


For each case, we choose the digits and operators that give the largest possible output, to see if it actually possible to reach the required neighborhood of values.
By inspection, I think it is fairly obvious that for each of the three cases above, filling the blanks with 9's and multiplication in the indicated positions (# for number, @ for operator) yields the largest possible output for each case:


*

*$2 9 \times 9 \times 5 = 1305$

*$2 \times 9 \times 9 5 = 1710$

*$2 \times 9 9 \times 5 = 990$


Any other digits or operators decrease the output, hence it is not possible to reach the neighborhood of $2015$, and therefore (I'm quite sure) the task is not possible.
A: As shown by the other answers, this problem is impossible with two operators and two regular digits. So we'll have to take liberties:
Taking the liberty of an extra possible operator gets us closer, as shown by Surb's comment to his own answer. If we take another operator than what he suggests, and include the factorial operator, then we get very close:
$$2 \cdot 7! / 5 = 2016$$
But there is another option if we don't restrict ourselves to base 10. If we can write either the number 1000 or 1010 with 2 'digits', then we can solve this problem quite easily. This requires a base of at least 32, since x^2 > 1010. Fortunately, base 32 is fairly straightforward if you're used to hexadecimal notation. It only extends to V, which is equal to 31 in base 10.
$$1000 = 31 \cdot 32 + 8 = V8$$
Therefore, if we accept base 32 as an allowed relaxation to your rule:
$$2 \cdot V8 + 5 = 2015$$
A: No where in the puzzle forces us to interpret the digits as decimal numbers.
In base $8$, we have:
$$21 \times +75 = 2015$$
A: This is not possible, the largest number we can make using two operations and two digits is given by
$$ 2 \cdot 9\cdot 95=1710<2015$$
so this problem has no solution stated as such. Of course if you relax the condition 2 operations-2 digits then, as proposed by 5xum (who proposed 2010+5), it is much easier.
A: The puzzle does not restrict the operations to binary, so using + as a unary operator opens up even more possibilities and allows to reach higher numbers. It seemed promising at first, but sadly none of the possibilities is 2015. Here's a table:
$$ 2\mathrm{X} \times +\mathrm{Y}5$$

