5
$\begingroup$

I'm new to fractional Sobolev spaces and I'm curious about the regularity of some simple functions like e.$\,$g. step functions in order to understand these spaces better.

In more detail, for $\Omega = [-1,1]^n \subseteq \mathbb{R^n}$ and $A = [-\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}]^n\subseteq \Omega$ consider the function $$ \begin{align} f \colon \ \Omega & \longrightarrow \mathbb{R} \\ x & \longmapsto \begin{cases} 1 & \text{ for } x \in A \\ 0 & \text{ for } x \notin A\text{.}\end{cases} \end{align} $$ For which $s \in [0,1]$ does $f$ have a finite Sobolev-Slobodeckij norm? The norm that is meant here is defined by $$ \Vert f\Vert_{s}^2 := \int_\Omega \int_\Omega \frac{\vert f(x) - f(y)\vert^2}{\Vert x-y\Vert^{2s+n}} \, \mathrm{d}x \, \mathrm{d}y\text{.} $$

Is there a way to determine the value of the integral analytically in dependence of $n$ and $s$? Or can one at least easily determine those $s$ for which this integral would be finite? Can it at least be done for $n=2$?

So far I tried the simple case $n=1$ for which I get that $s\in [0,\frac{1}{2})$ has to be fulfilled. I expect that to be the case for any $n$ but at the moment I'm not quite sure since I did not prove it. For $n=2$ I would try to integrate by hand but with my approach it's about to become a rather long calculation. Is there maybe an elegant way to do it? I don't mind if $A$ is replaced by another set like for example a scaled $n$-Sphere or some simplex.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Guessing

First I would make a quick guess based on the chart of function space. It groups together Sobolev spaces $W^{s,p}$ with the same value of $\frac n p -s$, because these are related by the embedding theorem. While the inclusion provided by this theorem is strict, the sharpness of the theorem still makes "the spaces with equal $\frac n p -s$ are similar" a useful heuristic.

Your function $f$ fails to be in $W^{1,1}$, because its gradient is not an $L^1$ function but rather a vector-valued measure supported on the boundary of $A$. On the other hand, this measure has finite mass (meaning $f\in BV$), which is pretty close to $W^{1,1}$. So, it seems that $s=1$, $p=1$ is at the edge of spaces to which $f$ belongs. From $$\frac{n}{1}-1 = \frac{n}{2} - s$$ we conclude that for $p=2$ (your question), the relevant $s$ is $s=1-\frac n2$.

This agrees with the situation in 1D, and suggests we won't find anything good when $n\ge 2$. Of course, this is just a guess; it may well be wrong.

Estimating

Recall the layercake principle: the integral of a nonnegative function $g$ is equal to $\int_0^\infty |\{g>t\}|\,dt$ where $|\cdot|$ stands for the measure of the set. So, let's consider the inequality $$ \frac{|f(x)-f(y)|}{\|x-y\|^{2s+n}}>t \tag{1} $$ for large values of $t$ (only they are of interest when the measure space has finite measure).

For (1) to hold, exactly one of $x,y$ must be in $A$; also, both must be within distance $\delta \approx t^{-1/( 2s+n)}$ of the boundary of $A$. This constrains $x$ to a set of measure $\approx \delta $. Also, $y$ must lie in a ball of radius $\delta$ around $x$. So,
$$ \left|\left\{ (x,y) : \frac{|f(x)-f(y)}{\|x-y\|^{2s+n}}>t\right\}\right| \approx \delta^2 \approx t^{-(n+1)/(2s+n)} $$ The integral over $t\ge 1$ converges iff $$\frac{ n+1}{2s+n} >1$$ which is equivalent to $s<1/2$.

(In particular, the "guess" wasn't correct after all.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you a lot! I like that approach especially since I had not seen that strategy before. But shouldn't it be $\left|\left\{ (x,y) : \frac{|f(x)-f(y)}{\|x-y\|^{2s+n}}>t\right\}\right| \approx t^{-(n+1)/(2s+n)} =: c^{n+1}$? Because, roughly spoken, each $x \in A$ gets a ball of feasible $y$ that has area $c^n$ and the strip of feasible $x\in A$ has an area of order $c$ (because the area of the strip is basically $\vert\partial A\vert \cdot c$). Then we would get $s \in [0,\frac{1}{2})$ for any dimension $n$ and $p = 2$. $\endgroup$ – Murp Aug 4 '15 at 9:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Murp Good catch; I edited. Left the incorrect guess there since in other situations it actually works. [Now that I think of it more, it works for functions where the singular set is a point.] $\endgroup$ – user147263 Aug 4 '15 at 15:08
0
$\begingroup$

The function belongs to $W^{s,1}$ and BV space as in paper "The fractional Cheeger problem".

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.