18
$\begingroup$

This picture is a copy of the pattern on my curtains. The points of a hexagonal lattice are each coloured with one of four possible colours. It has translational symmetry in two directions: a vertical shift by four lines and a horizontal shift by six lines. One generating patch is shown with a solid line.

Curtain

However if you change just three colours of the 24 in the generating patch, many more symmetries appear. This picture shows the same pattern, except that the colours within the dotted line have been changed. The new symmetries are: 180 degree rotational symmetry about any of the marked points and also a horizontal translation by three composed with the operation which switches dark blue for light blue and dark pink for light pink. The latter symmetry can be applied twice to get the horizontal translation by six symmetry from before.

Modified Curtain

If the person who designed this pattern didn't know about the extra symmetries, they might have just filled in the 24 colours in the generating patch at random and then translated it to produce the whole curtain. The number of ways of doing this is $4^{24}$.

However, they might have started by generating the full pattern. If they had done that, I think they would have only had 6 choices (both the rotation and the translation by 3 should cut the number of choices in half). If instead they had decided to start with the full pattern and then make up to three changes to it, they would have needed to make the 6 original choices, then choose three of 24 colours to change and the colours to change them to. The number of ways of doing this is $4^6 \times \binom{24}{3} \times 4^3$.

Thus, the probability that the first scenario (choosing 24 colours at random) would produce a pattern so close to the modified one is $\frac{4^6 \times \binom{24}{3} \times 4^3}{4^{24}} \approx 1.885 \times 10^{-6}$. This might suggest that they broke the full symmetry group intentionally to upset people like me. However, I do not know how to calculate the chance that a randomly chosen generating 6 by 4 patch would be close to a pattern with some extra symmetries.

My questions

  1. Suppose I generate a curtain pattern by choosing an $n$ by $m$ generating patch from $c$ possible colours. This pattern automatically has symmetry group $\mathbb{Z}^2$. What is the average number of colours I will have to change to get a larger group?

(Or more precisely, if I want the group to be, say, twice as big, how many changes will I have to make on average?) It's likely this depends on the underlying lattice (here, it's hexagonal) but I'm looking for techniques to answer this kind of question rather than numerical answers.

  1. The modified pattern has symmetry group generated by:

    • $a$, the vertical translation by 4
    • $b$, the horizontal translation by 3 combined with the colour switching
    • $c$, the rotation by 180 degrees about one of the marked points.

    It is $<a,b,c \mid c^2=e, cac=a^{-1}, cbc=b^{-1}>$, which is like two infinite dihedral groups combined together. Does this group have a name?

  2. Why would the designer intentionally break such a nice symmetry group?

$\endgroup$
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ I just like how you describe that this upsets you :) $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Aug 1 '15 at 12:26
  • $\begingroup$ There are only 17 kinds of group that appear in this way, and there are several naming conventions: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallpaper_group. Which of the 17 is the nicest is a matter of taste. $\endgroup$ – Colin Dec 4 '15 at 8:02
1
$\begingroup$

I will answer your question only partially:

As it is mentioned in the comments, such groups are very famous, known as the Wallpaper groups, and there are several notations to deal with them.

I would go on the other direction for turning one group into another: begin with the larger groups and start breaking the symmetries. By coloring, for example.

A periodic pattern should fit in one of the five lattices of the plane:

enter image description here

And the symmetry group of the lattice itself will be bigger than any other pattern which fits inside such lattice.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.