For a Hilbert space $L^2$ we have the notion of an orthonormal basis $\{f_j\}$ being a sequence of orthonormal elements such that any element $f$ in $L^2$ can be approximated by partial sums in terms of this basis $$f = \sum_{j=1}^\infty \langle f, f_j \rangle f_j$$ Here the sum converges wrt the $L^2$ norm. This is what I mean by generalized Fourier series.

I have been reading about Carleson's Theorem that says specifically for Fourier series, the series converges pointwise almost everywhere to the approximated function. I have also read that this is not true for a general orthonormal basis. I was hoping someone would be able to provide me with an example demonstrating that statement on a finite measure space, maybe $L^2([0,1])$: A function whose partial sums in terms of the basis do not convergence pointwise almost everywhere.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Here is something similar to yours: mathoverflow.net/q/209900/75968 $\endgroup$ – Svetoslav Jul 27 '15 at 21:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Of interest is Definition 8 and Theorem 11 from section 7 of this paper. $\endgroup$ – David Mitra Jul 28 '15 at 12:12
  • $\begingroup$ Section 9 of the paper linked above gives an example of what you want, I think. $\endgroup$ – David Mitra Jul 28 '15 at 12:22
  • $\begingroup$ The paper recommended by @DavidMitra says in page 602 that Zahorski in 1960 asserted the existence of an $L^2$ function whose Fourier series could be re-arranged to diverge a.e. If you take $f$ to be that function and the $f_j$ that particular rearrangement of the Fourier base, then I think you have your counter-example. $\endgroup$ – Enredanrestos Jul 28 '15 at 13:12
  • $\begingroup$ You can find classical results about this in Garcia Topics in Almost Everywhere Convergence. $\endgroup$ – David C. Ullrich Jul 28 '15 at 16:57

Thank you for the comments. I was able to use them to provide an answer to When does $\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} X_i$ exist for random sequences $\{X_i\}_{i=1}^{\infty}$?. I'll restate the result from there as it provides an example:

Consider the measure space $L^2([0,1])$ with uniform lebesgue measure. Define the functions (Haar functions) $f_{2^i + k}$ by $$f_{2^i + k} = 2^{i/2}\chi_{\left[\frac{k}{2^i}, \frac{k+1/2}{2^i}\right]} - 2^{i/2}\chi_{\left[\frac{k + 1/2}{2^i}, \frac{k+1}{2^i}\right]}$$ for $i \geq 1, 0 \leq k < 2^i$.

On pg. 598 of the paper mentioned in the comments: Topics in Orthogonal Functions - Price the author states the Haar functions defined above form a complete orthonormal basis. Then pg. 603 of the paper states

For every complete orthonormal system $\Phi$ there is an $L^2$ function $g$ whose $\Phi$-Fourier series can be rearranged to diverge almost everywhere.

So we can finish as follows. Take the Haar functions as above (a complete orthonormal set) and the function $g$ defined above. We write this function's $\Phi$-Fourier series as $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \langle g, f_n \rangle f_n$$ Now there exists a rearrangement $\sigma$ of the indices of the sum such that it diverges almost everywhere. Now let $g_n = \langle g, f_{\sigma(n)} \rangle f_{\sigma(n)}$ be this rearrangement of terms. The sum $\sum g_n$ diverges almost everywhere.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ One might mention that in the linked paper, a specific permutation of the Haar basis, and a sketch of a proof that that it "works", is given. $\endgroup$ – David Mitra Jul 28 '15 at 18:28
  • $\begingroup$ What does your notation $\chi_{[a,b]}$ mean? And what is "the function $g$ defined above"? $\endgroup$ – tparker Jan 26 '18 at 3:05
  • $\begingroup$ $\chi_{[a, b]}$ is the indicator function of the set $[a,b]$. It is $1$ for $x$ in the set and $0$ otherwise. $g$ is defined the highlighted text - "an $L^2$ function whose $\Phi$-Fourier can be rearranged to diverge almost everywhere." $\endgroup$ – muaddib Jan 26 '18 at 14:07
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, thanks, I missed the definition of $g$. $\endgroup$ – tparker Jan 26 '18 at 15:08
  • $\begingroup$ So the function sequence of partial sums $h_n(x)$ is Cauchy w.r.t. the $L^2$ norm, but the real sequence $h_n(x_0)$ is not Cauchy for any fixed $x_0$? $\endgroup$ – tparker Jan 26 '18 at 15:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.