6
$\begingroup$

Let $f_n$ be a sequence of Lebesgue measurable functions on $R^d$. Suppose you have an estimate of the form $\int_{R^d}\left|f_n\right|\le c_n$ where $c_n \downarrow 0$. Can you conclude that $f_n\to 0$ a.e.? If not, what additional conditions on ${c_n}$ would guarantee this?

My attempt: I think we cannot conclude that $f_n\to 0$ a.e. For example $A_1=[0,1/2]$, $A_2=[1/2,1]$, $A_3=[0,1/4],\ldots,A_6=[3/4,1]$, $A_7=[0,1/8],\ldots$. If $f_n$ is the indicator function of $A_n$, that is $f_n(x)=1$ if $x\in A_n$ and $f_n(x)=0$ else, then $f_n \to 0$ in all $L^p([0,1])$ because $\|f_n\|_p=\lambda(A_n)^{1/p}\to 0$ but there is no $x\in [0,1]$ with $f_n(x)\to 0$.

I have question in what additional conditions on ${c_n}$ would guarantee this? Maybe $c_n$ strictly decreasing? However, I have trouble proving this. Could someone kindly help about this? Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In short, convergence in $L^p$, $1\le p<+\infty$, is too weak for pointwise convergence, but one can find a subsequence that converges point-wise a.e. See more discussion here, here and here $\endgroup$ – A.Γ. Jul 24 '15 at 23:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ BTW there is a nice review of different type of convergence by Terence Tao $\endgroup$ – A.Γ. Jul 24 '15 at 23:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hint: Think about the condition $\sum_{n=1}^\infty c_n<\infty$. $\endgroup$ – user940 Jul 24 '15 at 23:15
  • $\begingroup$ @A.G.Thanks! But my question is under what condition can converge in Lp imply converge a.e. In the problem is what condition on $c_n$. $\endgroup$ – Sherry Jul 24 '15 at 23:17
  • $\begingroup$ @ByronSchmuland Thanks! Could you please give me more hint in proving this? Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Sherry Jul 24 '15 at 23:31
9
$\begingroup$

Suppose that $$\int_{R^d} \sum_{n=1}^\infty |f_n(x)|\,dx= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \int_{R^d} |f_n(x)|\,dx \leq \sum_{n=1}^\infty c_n<\infty.$$

This shows that $\sum_{n=1}^\infty |f_n(x)|<\infty$ for almost every $x\in R^d$, and hence $|f_n(x)|\to0$ for such $x$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! Just to make sure, is the interchanging of summation and limit by Tonelli's theorem? $\endgroup$ – Sherry Jul 24 '15 at 23:39
  • $\begingroup$ Well, monotone convergence is what I had in mind. $\endgroup$ – user940 Jul 24 '15 at 23:40
  • $\begingroup$ (+1) All right, now I see. $\endgroup$ – Jack D'Aurizio Jul 24 '15 at 23:41
  • $\begingroup$ @ByronSchmuland Thanks! Brilliant proof! $\endgroup$ – Sherry Jul 24 '15 at 23:42
  • $\begingroup$ You're welcome. $\endgroup$ – user940 Jul 24 '15 at 23:47
0
$\begingroup$

One condition that works is $c_n=0$ for all $n\geq k$ for some $k>0$. This is because $f_n=0$ almost surely for each $n\geq k$, so let $A_n$ be the set on which $f_n\neq 0$. Then $\cup_{n}A_n$ has measure 0 by countable additivity, so $f_n\rightarrow 0$ almost surely.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Alex. That is absolutely right for $c_n=0$ for all $n>k$. Could you explain why other conditions like $\sum _{n=0}^\infty c_n=0$ is not right? $\endgroup$ – Sherry Jul 24 '15 at 23:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.