0
$\begingroup$

I have a matrix with some elements known and some unknown. I am using the notation $A(X)$ where $X$ are the unknown elements (not sure if relevant but I will be solving for the unknown part $X$ later). For example, $$ A(x_{11},x_{22})=\left(\begin{array}{cc} x_{11} & 1 \\ 0 & x_{22} \end{array}\right) $$ then $x_{11}$ and $x_{22}$ are unknown.

Is this good notation? Should I be adding something to the notation to make it clearer? Is there better or standard notation for such matrices?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If you want to give variable names to the unknown positions there's not a better way than you have. Without naming them, some writers just place asterisks (i.e. *) where the unknown entries are. $\endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jul 21 '15 at 6:55
  • $\begingroup$ @coffeemath Thanks. Do you have a reference to a paper / notes (doesn't need to be authoritative) where this is done just to get an idea of how to set things up? $\endgroup$
    – user103828
    Jul 21 '15 at 7:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ When $x_i$ are not just unknown, but indeed not important to what you are planning to say, the notation with $*$ is used, for example, $\left(\begin{array}{cc} * & 1 \\ 0 & * \end{array}\right)$. See here. $\endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Jul 21 '15 at 8:35
1
$\begingroup$

This is fine, but a widely followed convention is to denote matrices by uppercase letters and their entries using the corresponding lowercase letters, so a slightly more conventional choice of notation would be

$$ A(a_{11},a_{22})=\left(\begin{array}{cc} a_{11} & 1 \\ 0 & a_{22} \end{array}\right)\;, $$

and you don't really need to include $a_{11},a_{22}$ as arguments unless you really want to emphasize the dependence, so

$$ A=\left(\begin{array}{cc} a_{11} & 1 \\ 0 & a_{22} \end{array}\right) $$

would be clear enough. But everyone will understand it the way you wrote it, too.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. It's important for me to emphasize certain elements. I will be solving for some of the elements in the matrix... I was trying to use notation that's similar to a function $f({\bf x})$ but trying to emphasize that the arguments are just some elements in a matrix. $\endgroup$
    – user103828
    Jul 21 '15 at 7:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @user103828: In that case, depending on the context, using $x_{11},x_{22}$ might even be preferable. $\endgroup$
    – joriki
    Jul 21 '15 at 7:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.