2
$\begingroup$

Let $X_1,X_2,\ldots$ be a sequence of random variables.

Weak (strong) law of large numbers states that:

If $X_1,X_2,\ldots$ are i.i.d. RVs and they have finite expectation $m$, then $\frac{X_1+\dots+X_n}{n}\rightarrow m$ stochastically (almost surely).

I wonder if those laws hold without assumption about independence/identical distribution or if we can exchange one assumption with some other one. Thanks for any input.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ you can replace iid by pairwise independent . Etemadi gave a proof for this in 1981 link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01013465 on the PTRF journal ! $\endgroup$ Jul 18 '15 at 17:09
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ See [this question][1] for a version of the strong law with some dependence assumptions. [1]: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1093047/… Generally you can easily prove the strong law by Chebyshev's inequality if you assume a fourth moment exists, so in doing this calculation, you can get away with both some dependence and even different distributions. $\endgroup$
    – Alex R.
    Jul 18 '15 at 17:09
2
$\begingroup$

A theorem by Markov states that if a sequence of random variables $X_1, X_2, \ldots$ with finite variances fulfills one of conditions:

  • $\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{n^2} \mathrm{Var} \sum_{i = 1}^n X_n = 0$;
  • $X_1, X_2, \ldots$ are independent and $\lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{1}{n^2}\sum_{i = 1}^n \mathrm{Var} X_i = 0$;

then the sequence $Y_n = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i - \mathsf{E} X_i)$ converges for $n \to \infty$ to $0$ in probability.

In addition, if random variables $X_1, X_2, \ldots$ are identically distributed, have finite variance and are uncorrelated (instead of independent), then the proof of the weak law of large numbers using Chebyshev's inequality still holds.

EDIT: Corrected the first condition, thanks to @Michael.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for interesting answer, what about strong law? And what is $\mu$ in this case? $\endgroup$
    – luka5z
    Jul 18 '15 at 17:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $\mu$ is a leftover from extra condition that $X_1, X_2, \ldots$ have the same expectation $\mu$. I edited it out. For the strong law, when the results mentioned in the comments to the question do not apply, I suspect, stricter constraints on variances or other absolute moments (similar to those in math.stackexchange.com/a/1351286/250821) are necessary. $\endgroup$
    – Budenn
    Jul 18 '15 at 17:53
  • $\begingroup$ This is false. The first condition is not sufficient for convergence, even if we augment that condition by assuming $\{X_i\}_{i=1}^{\infty}$ are mutually independent. See math.stackexchange.com/questions/3975818/… $\endgroup$
    – Michael
    Jan 7 at 13:42
1
$\begingroup$

As the other answer has used independence, I want to present a version which doesn't need any independence at all.

Let $X_n$ be random variables fulfilling:

  • $ \mathbb{E} [X_n^2] \leq C $ for some constant $C$ not depending on n.
  • $ | Cov(X_m,X_n) | \leq r(| m - n |) $, with $ r : \mathbb{N_0} \mapsto [0,\infty) $ such that $ \lim\limits_{k \to \infty} r(k) = 0 $

Then, $$ \frac 1 n \sum\limits_{l=1}^n (X_l - \mathbb{E}[X]) \to 0 $$ in probability and $L^2$ as $n \to \infty$.

Thus the weak law also holds if you have random variables which are not uncorrelated but merely decorrelate.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.