For reasons I'll explain below the question if you're interested, I stumbled across a peculiar phenomenon involving numbers divisible by their digits.

I'm concerned with numbers that are divisible by all of its digits, and do not have any zeros or repeated digits.

Ex: 175, 9867312, 1

Not: 111, 105

There are 548 such numbers: 105 of them have 6 or more digits. (There can't be any with more than 7 digits, for reasons I'll leave you to discover.*) For some reason, though, no six- or seven- digit numbers have any 4's in their digits. Why?

I know why there can't be any 8 digit numbers: 1+2+3+4+6+7+8+9 = 40, which is not divisible by 3, so 9, 6, and 3 won't divide. But why don't 4's show up past 6 digits?

Explanation for why I have this question:

*About two years ago I was in a TI-Basic programming competition which required me to write the following program:

A number is said to be "digisible" if it meets the following three conditions: - It has no 0; - All digits which compose it are different from each other; - It is divisible by each of the digits that compose it. You will have to make a program that asks a positive integer greater than or equal to 10 and displays 1 if it is digisible, 0 if it is not.

This was a fun challenge to create and super-optimize in TI-Basic. TI-Basic is really slow, so it wasn't possible to check all numbers for "digisible"-ness. However, in the past year I learned Java, which is speedy-fast. So I returned to the problem and made a program to list out ALL of the digisible numbers.

Looking at all of the Digisibles, I noticed some cool things, some of which makes sense, others which I couldn't find an explanation for. This question is one that I couldn't find an explanation for, but highly suspect one exists.

Hint: 5's do not show up past 5 digit numbers.


As you point out, a 7-digit number cannot have a 5 in it (otherwise, it would have to end in 5, but would have to have one of 2, 4, 6, or 8 in it, so must be even). Thus a 7-digit number $x$ contains 7 of 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9. We need only identify the missing digit. If it is not 9, the resulting number must be divisible by 9, so the missing digit must be 4 ($40-4 = 36$). If the missing digit is 9, then the digits are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8. But the sum here is $40-9=31$, which is not divisible by 3. So this cannot happen.

Thus any 7-digit number of this type must consist of the digits 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9.

  • $\begingroup$ That explains why there aren't any 7-digit numbers. What about 6-digit numbers? I tried using similar reasoning for 6 digits, but didn't get anywhere. $\endgroup$ – Simon Alford Jul 17 '15 at 17:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's not true for 6 digits, is it? How about 123984? If I've interpreted your question correctly, there are 248 such six-digit numbers, all but 12 of which contain a 4. $\endgroup$ – rogerl Jul 20 '15 at 19:37
  • $\begingroup$ Wow, you're right. I can't believe I didn't notice that. It was only seven digit numbers which don't have 4s. That concludes the mystery... Thank you! $\endgroup$ – Simon Alford Jul 22 '15 at 2:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.