8
$\begingroup$

I have a question concerning the aforementioned topic :)

So, with $f_X(t)={\lambda} e^{-\lambda t}$, we get: $$\phi_X(t)=\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{tX}\lambda e^{-\lambda X}dX =\lambda \int_{0}^{\infty}e^{(t-\lambda)X}dX =\lambda \frac{1}{t-\lambda}\left[ e^{(t-\lambda)X}\right]_0^\infty =\frac{\lambda}{t-\lambda}[0-(1)]$$ but only, if $(t-\lambda)<0$, else the integral does not converge. But how do we know that $(t-\lambda)<0$? Or do we not know it at all, and can only give the best approximation? Or (of course) am I doing something wrong? :)

Yours, Marie!

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The MGF is defined only for $t<\lambda$, here. The integral, of course, diverges otherwise. $\endgroup$ – David Mitra Apr 23 '12 at 22:16
5
$\begingroup$

You did nothing wrong. The moment generating function of $X$ simply isn't defined, as your work shows, for $t\ge\lambda$.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Notice that this is more than what we need for the usual use of the MGF : obtaining the moments of the random variable. Eventually, provided that all the $n-th$ moments are defined, one has $\frac{\partial^n}{\partial t^n} \phi_X(t)|_{t=0} = E(X^n)$. To be able to use this, you really just need $\phi_X(t)$ to be defined in a neighborhood of $t=0$. $\endgroup$ – Martin Van der Linden Nov 14 '13 at 18:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.