Thanks for clarifications. Now i am posting the question in a different way.

Suppose a vector $V$ is orthogonal to vectors $X1$ and $X2$.

$X1$ and $X2$ are linearly independent.

Now if $V$ is also orthogonal to vectors $Y1$ and $Y2$ or in other words the dot product is zero, can we say the all vectors i.e., $X1\; X2 \;Y1 \;Y2$ are linearly dependent, since all vectors share the same orthoganal vectors.

Now let dot product of $V$ is nonzero with $Y3$, can we say $X1\; X2 \;Y3$ are linearly independent.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Certainly not, consider the case $X_1 = Y_1$ and $X_2 = Y_2$. $\endgroup$ – Travis Willse Jul 10 '15 at 15:08
  • $\begingroup$ For your edit, please see my updated answer. $\endgroup$ – hexaflexagonal Jul 10 '15 at 15:55


$$X_1=(1,0,0)$$ $$X_2=(0,1,0)$$ $$Y_1=(-1,0,0)$$ $$Y_2=(0,-1,0)$$ $$V=(0,0,1)$$

Plot [Plot via Wolfram Alpha]

Edit for the reposed question: Answer to the first part is still no. $$X_1=(1,0,0,0,0)$$ $$X_2=(0,1,0,0,0)$$ $$Y_1=(0,0,1,0,0)$$ $$Y_2=(0,0,0,1,0)$$ $$V=(0,0,0,0,1)$$ All vectors are linearly independent (and orthogonal).

As for $Y_3$, yes, we can say that it is linearly independent of $X_1$ and $X_2$. Put loosely, we know this because $Y_3$ is non-orthogonal to $V$, and any linear combination of $X_1$ and $X_2$ will be orthogonal to $V$ (since they themselves are orthogonal to $V$).

  • $\begingroup$ No problem! Glad to help. $\endgroup$ – hexaflexagonal Jul 10 '15 at 18:41

The vector, v= <0, 0, 1> is perpendicular to X1= <1, 0, 0> and X2= <0, 1, 0> as well as to Y1= <1, 1, 0> and Y2= <1, -1, 0> but those four vectors are not independent. I don't know what you mean by "uncorrelated" vectors.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.