-2
$\begingroup$

How did this particular equation come about? I haven't seen it before in the summation rules index on wikipedia:

$$\sum\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} x_i =\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^{k} x_i\right)+x_{k+1} $$

Edit: I guess what i meant to say was if there was any sort of proof for this equation.

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by Adam Hughes, Daniel, Claude Leibovici, Paramanand Singh, user98602 Jul 7 '15 at 16:28

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Addition is associative $\endgroup$ – TomGrubb Jul 6 '15 at 18:53
2
$\begingroup$

Since $$\sum\limits_{i=1}^{k} x_i =x_1 +x_2+\cdots + x_k$$ Then $$\sum\limits_{i=1}^{\color{red}{k+1}} x_i =x_1 +x_2+\cdots + x_k+\color{red}{x_{k+1}}$$ Therefore $$\sum\limits_{i=1}^{\color{red}{k+1}} x_i = \left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^{k} x_i\right)+\color{red}{x_{k+1}}$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. I know it was a simple question but I was still stuck because I'm just dumb like that. :) $\endgroup$ – Turing101 Jul 7 '15 at 0:21
  • $\begingroup$ @Turing101, your welcome. We all have our moments. Just keep practicing. $\endgroup$ – k170 Jul 7 '15 at 0:31
0
$\begingroup$

This is a rather straightforward statement:

The sum of the first $k$ terms of a sequence, plus the "$k+1$"st term, is equal to the sum of the first $k+1$ terms of this sequence.

Try not to let complicated-looking notation get in the way of your understanding!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I can see how that works, but i was using it in mathematical induction, and i kept getting the wrong answers, so i began searching for a proof. Is there one? $\endgroup$ – Turing101 Jul 6 '15 at 18:56
  • $\begingroup$ This statement is more of a definition than something that should be proved, in my opinion. Especially in an induction question, I'm assuming you're trying to prove an expression for $$\sum_{i=1}^k x_i$$ by showing that this expression holds when adding the $k+1$th term. $\endgroup$ – Ashkay Jul 6 '15 at 18:57
  • $\begingroup$ yeah, that's how I tried to view it when I was doing the questions in the text book but apparently the (k+1) term changes according to the power of the what your trying to sum. Basically if (x_i) is squared, then (k+1) is also squared and so on. So I was wondering how I would adjust it according to any summation that I would do induction proofs for. $\endgroup$ – Turing101 Jul 7 '15 at 0:20

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.