Working through Ian Stewart's "Galois Theory, Third Edition," he states at the end of the second paragraph on page 13: "Because we know that $\alpha_1+\alpha_2+\alpha_3$ is minus the coefficient of $t^2$..." in reference to the monic cubic $P(t)=t^3+a t^2 + b t + c$.

It's easy to verify this just grinding through Cardano's formula solution or with Mathematica:

P[t_] := t^3 + a t^2 + b t + c
r = Solve[P[t] == 0, t];
(r[[1, 1, 2]] + r[[2, 1, 2]] + r[[3, 1, 2]]) // FullSimplify

produces $-a$.

But that's hardly adequate. Stewart states this so offhandedly that he must mean it to be completely obvious, but I don't quite see it. I've been playing around with the Tschirnhaus transformation at the top of page 8 for some time, and I'm convinced that it holds the key to the erstwhile obvious knowledge because it makes the quadratic term go away:

In[..]:= P[y - a/3] // Collect[#, y] &
Out[..]= (2 a^3)/27 - (a b)/3 + c + (-(a^2/3) + b) y + y^3

$P\left(y-\frac{a}{3}\right)=y^3+y \left(b-\frac{a^2}{3}\right)+\frac{2 a^3}{27}-\frac{a b}{3}+c$

Substituting the roots doesn't produce anything more obvious to me.

I'm sure I'm just being obtuse, but I'd be grateful for a ray of light on this.

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ factor the cubic as $(t- \alpha_1)(t - \alpha_2)(t-\alpha_3)$ Now look for terms in the product which are quadratic in t. This works for any polynomial with lead coefficient 1: the coefficient of the second highest degree term is -(sum of the roots) $\endgroup$ – lulu Jul 6 '15 at 3:26
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ See Vieta's formulas at Wikipedia or elsewhere. $\endgroup$ – Martin Sleziak Jul 6 '15 at 6:37

You can learn this by expanding the factored form of the cubic. If we suppose $a$, $b$ and $c$ are the roots, then: $$(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)=x^3 - (a+b+c)x^2 + (ab+bc+ca)x - abc$$ It's a good thought to do this out by hand if you've not seen it before. Notice that when we multiply monomials like $(x-a)$, we just "take" one term from each monomial and multiply them together - so the coefficients of $x^2$ are when we "take" the $x$ from $2$ of the monomials and take the (negative) constant from the remaining one. Summing all that up yields $-(a+b+c)$ as the coefficient of $x^2$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.