4
$\begingroup$

Hi this is problem 1 in Chapter 5 Evans PDE. I have trouble showing the second part, i.e. completeness of $C^{k,\gamma}$. I know there is some previous posts but I did not quite get the answers. And I found a version that makes me feel better… enter link description here

However I am still lost…simply I do not get the logical steps in tackling the problem.

well, my understanding is that, to show any arbitrary space $M$ is complete. One needs to show 1) Every Cauchy sequence in $M$ has a limit. (Hence, I think this is step 1 in the link) 2) The limit is also within the same space $M$. (Step 3)

Could anyone explain the flow in the proof of Theorem 2.1.2 p.12 ? (especially, Im lost what is step 2 for…)

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Note that in step one, it is given that for any multi-index $\alpha$ with $\|\alpha\| \le k$, $D^\alpha u_n$ converges uniformly to some function $u_\alpha$. In particular, $u_n \to u $ uniformly.

You do not know, a priori, how all these $u_\alpha$'s are related. In particular, you do not know $u_\alpha = D^\alpha u$. (Actually, from step $1$ alone you do not know even if $u$ is differentiable. So step 2 is basically showing that $u \in C^k(\overline\Omega)$ .

Step $3$ shows furthermore that $u \in C^{k, \gamma}(\overline\Omega)$, while step 4 shows that you do have $u_n \to u$ in $C^{k, \gamma}$ norm.

Remark I will write a proof for the case $k=0$, illustrating the general procedure.

Recall that the $C^{0, \gamma}$ norm is given by

$$\|u\| = \sup_{x\in \overline\Omega}|u(x)| + \sup_{x, y\in \overline\Omega,x\neq y} \frac{|u(x) - u(y)|}{|x-y|^\gamma}.$$

Now we show that $C^{0, \gamma}(\overline\Omega)$ is complete. Let $\{u_n\}$ be a Cauchy sequence in $C^{0, \gamma}$. Then there is $C>0$ so that $\|u_n\| \le C$ (Do you know why?).

Claim $1$: The family $\{u_n\}$ are equicontinuous.

To see this let $\epsilon >0$. Let $\delta$ be small so that $C \delta^\gamma <\epsilon$. Then for all $n$ and $x, y\in \overline\Omega$ and $|x-y|<\delta$, we have

$$|u_n(x) - u_n(y)| \le C|x-y|^\gamma < C\delta^\gamma <\epsilon$$

Thus the claim is shown.

Now as $\{u_n\}$ are also uniformly bounded (that is, $|u_n(x)|\le C$ for all $n$ and all $x\in \Omega$), by Arzelà–Ascoli_theorem there is $u\in C^0(\overline\Omega)$ so that $u_n \to u$ in $C^0$-norm.

Now we show that $u\in C^{0, \gamma}(\overline\gamma)$. Fix $x, y\in \overline\Omega$, $x\neq y$. Then as $u_n(x) \to u(x)$, we have

$$C\ge \frac{|u_n(x) - u_n(y)|}{|x-y|^\gamma} \to \frac{|u(x) - u(y)|}{|x-y|^\gamma}.$$

As $x, y$ are arbitrary, we have

$$\sup_{x, y\in \overline\Omega,x\neq y}\frac{|u(x)-u(y)|}{|x-y|^\gamma} \le C .$$

Together with the fact that $u \in C^0$, we have $u \in C^{0, \gamma}(\overline\Omega)$.

Lastly, we show that $u_n \to u$ in $C^{0, \gamma}(\overline \Omega)$. That is, $\|u_n-u\|\to 0$ as $n\to \infty$ (where $\|\cdot\|$ is the $C^{0, \gamma}$-norm).

Note that we have already that $u_n\to u$. Now for any $x, y,n$ fixed, as $uu_m(x) \to u(x)$ (similar for $y$),

$$\begin{split} \frac{|u_n(x) - u(x) - (u_n(y) - u(y))|}{|x-y|^\gamma} &\le \limsup_{m\to \infty} \frac{|u_n(x) - u_m(x) - (u_n(y) - u_m(y))|}{|x-y|^\gamma}\\ &\le \limsup_{m\to \infty} \|u_m -u_n\|. \end{split}$$

As $\{u_n\}$ is a Cauchy sequence, the right hand side converges to zero (independent of $x, y$). Thus

$$\|u_n - u\| \to 0$$

as $n\to \infty$. Thus $u_n \to u$ in $C^{0, \gamma}$ norm and so the space is complete.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, thanks. Another thing I forgot to ask. In step 1 of the proof, $\{u_m(x)\}$ is uniformly bounded sequence. Why uniformly? Is it because $\bar{\Omega}$ is compact and so the Cauchy sequence $u_m$ converges uniformly to some $u$ on the compact set $\bar{\Omega}$? $\endgroup$ – math101 Jul 6 '15 at 4:45
  • $\begingroup$ @math101 : As $\{u_n\}$ is a Cauchy sequence, so the $C^{k, \gamma}$ norm is bounded. This in particular implies that the $C^0$ norm is bounded. Note that $C^0$ bound alone does not imply that $u_n$ converges uniformly to a function (for example, $u_n = x^n$ on $[0,1]$). One need to use Ascoli-Arzela theorem, each require that $u_n$ are equicontinuous. $\endgroup$ – user99914 Jul 6 '15 at 5:47
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. Uniform boundedness and equicontinuous are equivalent, right? $\endgroup$ – math101 Jul 6 '15 at 5:57
  • $\begingroup$ No. Think of that $u_n =x^n$ on $[0,1]$. It's uniformly bounded, but not equicontinuous. @math101 $\endgroup$ – user99914 Jul 6 '15 at 5:58
  • $\begingroup$ but i found books.google.com.au/… $\endgroup$ – math101 Jul 6 '15 at 5:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.