1
$\begingroup$

I am studying (co)-induced representations of topological groups and I came across the following situation:

$G$ is a topological group, $H$ a closed subgroup and $f\colon G\to W$ a set-theoretic map, where $W$ is a (complex) vector space (in fact, it is a vector space on which $H$ acts but for the moment let us ignore this). We say that $f$ is compactly supported modulo $H$ if $supp(f) \subseteq HC$ for some compact set $C$ in $G$.

My question: is this equivalent with saying that the image of $supp(f)$ is compact in $H\backslash G$ (where the quotient space is endowed with the usual topology)?

Now I add some further assumptions: $G$ is a locally profinite group (= locally compact + totally disconnected or equivalently: Hausdorff + the unit $1\in G$ has a fundamental system of compact open subgroups), $H$ a closed subgroup of $G$ acting on $W$, and $f$ a map satisfying

$f(hg) = \sigma(h)f(g)$

for all $h\in H,g\in G$ (where $\sigma$ is the map describing the action of $H$). Is the previous statement true now? Thanks in advance!

AYK

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Yes this is true. I guess you know this, but to give the question context for anyone else reading it, let me point out that if $(\sigma,W)$ is a representation of a closed subgroup $H$ of $G$, then the compactly induced represenation $cInd_H^G \sigma$ of $G$ is defined to be the set of functions $f:G\rightarrow W$ such that, for all $h\in H$, $g\in G$, $f(hg)=\sigma(h)f(g)$ and $supp(f)$ is compact in $H\backslash G$, equipped with the action of $G$ by left translation.

So our claim is that $supp(f)$ is compact in $H\backslash G$ if and only if there is a compact set $C\subset G$ such that $supp(f)\subset HC$.

The "if" direction is clear. For the "only if" direction, suppose $supp(f)$ is compact in $H\backslash G$, and take its preimage $X$ in $G$, which is a disjoint union of $H$ cosets. Let $\{g\}$ denote a set of representatives of these cosets, reduced in the sense that each coset is represented exactly once; then the projection $G\rightarrow H\backslash G$ homeomorphically maps $\{g\}$ to $supp(f)$. Write $C=\{g\}$. Then $C$ is compact and one certainly has $supp(f)\subset HC$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I missed the fact that $\{g\}\to supp(f)$ is indeed a homeomorphism. $\endgroup$ – AYK Jul 5 '15 at 16:32
  • $\begingroup$ @PL. Why is the quotient map a homeomorphism in this case? I tried to show this using the fact that the quotient map from G is open, but got stuck. $\endgroup$ – darkl Jun 11 '16 at 16:37
  • $\begingroup$ The quotient map might not be a homeomorphism; all that's true is that when you restrict it to the system of coset representatives it gives a homeomorphism. That much is immediate from the quotient map being open. $\endgroup$ – PL. Jun 12 '16 at 15:02
  • $\begingroup$ @PL. How do I do show it? I want to show that an open subset of the representatives maps to an open subset. I want to use the fact that the quotient map (without restriction) is open. I thought about writing the open subset of representatives as an intersection of an open subset and the set of representatives, but this open subset might have a different image under the quotient map. This is where I'm stuck. $\endgroup$ – darkl Jun 12 '16 at 20:44
  • $\begingroup$ @PL. in other words I don't understand why if $A \subseteq \{g\}$ and $A = U\cap\{g\}$ where $U \subseteq G$ is open then $ AH \subseteq G $ is open. (Note that $UH$ can be bigger than $AH$) $\endgroup$ – darkl Jun 12 '16 at 22:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.