Let $B=(B_t)_{t\ge 0}$ be a Brownian motion on a probability space $(\Omega,\mathcal A,\operatorname{P})$, i.e. $B$ is a real-valued stochastic process with
- $B_0=0$ almost surely
- $B$ has independent and stationary increments
- $B_t\sim\mathcal{N}_{0,\;t}$
- $B$ is almost surely continuous
Here, stationary increments means, that $$B_{s+t}-B_t\sim B_s\;\;\;\text{for all }s,t\ge 0\;.$$ It's easy to verify, that $B$ has the following property:
$(B_{s+t}-B_t)_{s\ge 0}$ is a Brownian motion independent of $(B_s)_{s\le t}$, for all $s<t$.
Some people call this property Markov property. However, the definition of the elementary Markov property, that I know, is as follows:
Let $I\subseteq\mathbb{R}$ and $E$ be a Polish space. A stochastic process $X=(X_t)_{t\in I}$ with values in $E$ has the elementary Markov property $:\Leftrightarrow$ $$\operatorname{P}\left[X_t\in A\mid\mathcal{F}_s\right]=\operatorname{P}\left[X_t\in A\mid X_s\right]\;\;\;\text{for all }A\in\mathcal{B}(E)\text{ and }s,t\in I\text{ with }s\le t\;,$$ where $(\mathcal{F}_t)_{t\in I})$ is the filtration generated by $X$ and $\mathcal{B}(E)$ is the Borel $\sigma$-algebra on $E$.
In the case of the Brownian motion $B$: Can we show, that both properties are equivalent or one implies the other?