5
$\begingroup$

Let $A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$ be a positive semidefinite matrix, $b\in\mathbb{R}^n$, $k>0$, and $g:\mathbb{R}^n\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ be a positive function. Consider the system of nonlinear equations $$ (1) \quad Ax=-k\frac{x}{g(x)}-b. $$ Let $A^+$ be the Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse of $A$. For every $q\in\mathbb{R}^n$, consider the system of nonlinear equations $$ (2)\quad x=-kA^+\frac{x}{g(x)}-A^+b+(I-A^+A)q. $$ Find $q\in\mathbb{R}^n$ such that (1) is equivalent to (2).

My attempt

1) Observe that if $A$ is non-singular then (1) is equivalent to (2) for all $q\in\mathbb{R}^n$. Indeed, since $A$ is non-singular, $A^+=A^{-1}$ and so (2) is rewritten as
$$ x=-kA^{-1}\frac{x}{g(x)}-A^{-1}b+(I-A^{-1}A)q $$ which is equivalent to (1).

2) For each soluion $x$ of (1) there exists $q\in\mathbb{R}^n$ such that $x$ is the solution set of (2). Indeed, suppose that $x$ is a solution of (1). Then $$ Ax=-k\frac{x}{g(x)}-b. $$ Multiplying both sides of the above equation with $AA^+$ we obtain $$ AA^+Ax=-AA^+k\frac{x}{g(x)}-AA^+b. $$ Since $AA^+A=A$, the above equation is rewritten as $$ A\left(x+kA^+\frac{x}{g(x)}+A^+b\right)=0. $$ Therefore, there exits $q\in\mathbb{R}^n$ such that $$ x+kA^+\frac{x}{g(x)}+A^+b=(I-A^+A)q $$ or $$ x=-kA^+\frac{x}{g(x)}-A^+b+(I-A^+A)q. $$ Hence, $x$ is the solution of (2).

Thank you for all kind help and comments.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ It is my pleasure if someone gives comments or hint in my question. $\endgroup$
    – Blind
    Jul 6, 2015 at 16:29

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$
  1. We may assume that $A=D=diag((\lambda_i)_i)$ where $\lambda_i\geq 0$. Indeed $A=PDP^T$, where $P$ is orthogonal, and let $x=Py,b=Pc$. Then the equation (1) can be rewritten $Dy=-ky/g(Py)-c=-ky/h(y)-c$ where $h>0$.

In the sequel $A=D$ and, consequently, for every $i$, $x_i=\dfrac{-b_i}{\lambda_i+k/g(x)}$. Note that $D^+=diag((\mu_i)_i)$ where $\mu_i=1/\lambda_i$ if $\lambda_i\not=0$ and $\mu_i=0$ if $\lambda_i=0$.

  1. Consider the equation (2). When $\lambda_i\not=0$, we obtain the same relations as in equation (1) and $q_i$ is arbitrary. When $\lambda_i$=0, we obtain $x_i=q_i$, that is $q_i=\dfrac{-b_i}{\lambda_i+k/g(x)}$. In particular, $q_i$ depends on $x$, that implies that the equation (2) is very complicated!!
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank for your comments and helping. Here, $A$ is not symmetric. How can we diagonalize $A$? $\endgroup$
    – Blind
    Jul 9, 2015 at 13:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.