I would like to derive the Fourier transform of $f(x)=\ln(x^2+a^2)$, where $a\in \mathbb{R}^+$ by making use of the properties:

\begin{equation} \mathcal{F}[f'(x)]=(ik)\hat{f}(k)\\ \mathcal{F}[-ixf(x)]=\hat{f}'(k) \end{equation} For the Fourier transform I use the definition given by:

\begin{equation} \hat{f}(k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)e^{-ikx}dx, k \in \mathbb{R} \end{equation} Until now I found out that by taking the derivative of $f$ and finding the Fourier transform of $f'$ I can then use the relation $\mathcal{F}[f'(x)]=(ik)\hat{f}(k)$ and find $\hat{f}$. The derivative of $f$ would be: \begin{equation} f'(x)=\frac{2x}{x^2+a^2} \end{equation} and by considering $g(x)=1/(x^2+a^2)$, I then have: \begin{equation} f'(x)=2xg(x) \end{equation} Now I know that the Fourier transform of $g$ is given by:

\begin{equation} \hat{g}(k)=\frac{1}{a}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}e^{-a|k|}, a \in \mathbb{R}, k\in \mathbb{R} \end{equation} Now I must find the Fourier transform of $xg(x)$ which would be given by the derivative of $\hat{g}$ right? But how can this possible since $\hat{g}$ has no derivative?

I think I am really close now but I need that extra tip.

Thank you!

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $\hat{g}$ is differentiable everywhere except at $0$. It is however absolutely continuous, so the almost everywhere defined derivative is what you want. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Jun 27 '15 at 20:57
  • $\begingroup$ @DanielFischer Are you sure that I can do that? Because I think that I am not supposed to differentiate in this particular case. Is everything else correct until the point I have reached? $\endgroup$ – Mitscaype Jun 27 '15 at 21:01
  • $\begingroup$ I haven't carefully checked whether you made any mistakes so far, and at the moment, I'm not in the mood to do it. Looks okay so far, however. Differentiating $g$ to get the Fourier transform of $f'$ is legitimate here (don't forget that there are some constant factors to take care of). Your problem comes when you divide by $k$ to get the Fourier transform of $f$, because what you get then is not a tempered distribution. And that indicates that something is amiss. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Jun 27 '15 at 21:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DanielFischer You are right, I do know that $f$ defines a tempered distribution (even though I cannot prove it). And I also know that the Fourier transform of an $f \in \mathcal{S}$ has a Fourier transform that is also defined in the same space. But the Fourier transform here is (finally) given by: \begin{equation} \hat{f}(k)=-\sqrt{2\pi}\frac{e^{-|ak|}}{|k|}\end{equation} which I do not know if it is a "function" of the same space. Anyway, thank you for your assistance! $\endgroup$ – Mitscaype Jun 27 '15 at 21:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Minor suggestion to the question (v2): Replace the condition $a\in\mathbb{R}$ with $a>0$ in two places. $\endgroup$ – Qmechanic Jun 28 '15 at 12:03

If $\left| x \right|^{-1}$ is the distribution defined as $$\left( \left| x \right|^{-1}, \phi \right) = \int_{\left| x \right| < 1} \frac {\phi(x) - \phi(0)} {\left| x \right|} dx + \int_{\left| x \right| > 1} \frac {\phi(x)} {\left| x \right|} dx,$$ then $${\mathcal F}\!\left[ \ln\left( x^2 +a^2 \right) \right] = \frac 1 {\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \ln\left( x^2 +a^2 \right) e^{-i k x} dx = -\sqrt{2 \pi} \left( \frac { e^{-a \left| k \right|}} {\left| k \right|} + 2 \gamma \delta(k) \right),$$ where $\gamma$ is Euler's constant. Probably the easiest way to prove it is to compute the inverse transform directly from the definition of $\left| x \right|^{-1}$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.