Given that a finite vector space $V = \operatorname{GF}(p)^n$ corresponds to the finite field $F = \operatorname{GF}(p^n)$, I'm wondering about how the multiplicative subgroup of $F$, $F^*$, acts on subspaces of $V$. Since $F$ is a field, we know that any element of $F^*$ is a linear automorphism of V, and is in $\operatorname{GL}(V)$. It therefore maps $k$-dimensional subspaces to $k$-dimensional subspaces. Further, we know that $F^*$ is the cyclic group of order $p^n - 1$. However, there are a couple things I'm wondering:

1) When will the action, for a given $p^n$ and $k$, be semi-regular: i.e. when will there be at most one $x \in F^*$ that maps between two $k$-dimensional subspaces $U_1$ and $U_2$.

2) What will the orbits under this action look like? Particularly, when will several subspaces in the orbit of a given $t$-dimensional space lie in a $t+1$-dimensional subspace, for example when will several 3-space in the same orbit lie in a single 4-space. I know that in the highly specific case where $p=2$ and $gcd(n,6)=1$, there are a number of 3-spaces (projective planes) containing three 2-spaces (projective lines) in the same orbit equal to the number of 2-spaces (projective lines) in the vector space. But do we know that, in general, an orbit will intersect like this?

I especially care about the case where $p=2$: if anyone knows anything about the action of $\operatorname{GF}(2^n)^*$ on its underlying vector space, or any books / articles that talk about this stuff, it would be tremendously appreciated.

Thank you!

(The question ultimately relates to a project where I am looking for designs over a finite field, and hence am trying to find collections of subspaces with certain regularities. Orbits under the multiplicative group seem very useful. Some related ideas come from: Thomas, Simon. "Designs over finite fields." Geometriae Dedicata 24.2 (1987): 237-242.)

  • $\begingroup$ The action of the multiplicative group of the field is actually rather boring, as it fixes every subspace. It is just scalar multiplication. $\endgroup$ – Matt Samuel Jun 26 '15 at 22:56
  • $\begingroup$ While it's true that $(\mathbb{F}_p)^n\cong\mathbb{F}_{p^n}$ as $\mathbb{F}_p$-vector spaces, I'd argue it's incorrect to state that one "corresponds" to the other. There is no canonical isomorphism, you have to choose one explicitly. $\endgroup$ – Zev Chonoles Jun 26 '15 at 22:57
  • $\begingroup$ Matt - yes, but I am considering the multiplicative group of the entire field, rather than just the prime field. Zev - that's a good point. However the global properties of the orbits should not depend on which vector you choose to generate the field. $\endgroup$ – Kavi D. Jun 26 '15 at 23:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is probably better to just not say that $F_{p^n}$ corresponds to anything. Just ask what is the action of the multiplicative group of $F_{p^n}$ on the set of the $F_p$-subspaces of $F_{p^n}$, and voilà. No ugly "corresponds". $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Jun 26 '15 at 23:38
  • $\begingroup$ Good point! I'm new to this - should I edit the question? $\endgroup$ – Kavi D. Jun 26 '15 at 23:45

The correspondence through the use of the Field Reduction map will give a canonical way to view $\mathbb{F}_{q^n}$ as $\mathbb{F}_{q}^{n}$.

1) $\mathbb{F}_{q^n}^{*}$ will not act semiregularly on the $k$-spaces of $PG(n-1,q)$ for odd $q$, because the elements in the base field $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ will act as the identity. Although for $q=2$ this is okay. In general, you can consider a subgroup $\langle \mu \rangle$, where $\mu \in \mathbb{F}_{q^{n}}^*$ and ask if this group acts semi-regularly.

For q=2, you are in a very special case; $\mathbb{F}_{q^n}^{*}$ acts as a Singer cycle on the space, a cyclic group acting sharply transitive on the points. The action on other subspaces has been studied in

D. Glynn, On a set of lines of PG(3,q) corresponding to a maximal cap contained in the Klein quadric of PG(5,q), Geom. Dedicata 26 (1988) #3, 273-280. (lines)

K. Drudge, On the orbits of Singer groups and their subgroups, Elec. J. of Comb. 9 (2002)

  • $\begingroup$ Field Reduction map - what's that? Any references where it is discussed? $\endgroup$ – Zev Chonoles Jul 5 '15 at 20:23
  • $\begingroup$ Here is a good reference that gives a nice, well-cited introduction to the technique and places it has been used arxiv.org/abs/1310.8522 $\endgroup$ – Morgan Rodgers Jul 5 '15 at 20:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.