2
$\begingroup$

Let $R$ be a Noetherian commutative ring with unity, and $S=R[x_1,\dots,x_r]$. Let $f\in S$ and suppose that the ideal generated by the coefficients of $f$ is $R$. How to show that $f$ is a nonzerodivisor on $S/IS$ for every ideal $I$ of $R$?

What I tried:

By Noetherianity, I can pick an ideal $I$ maximal among those ideals $J$ such that $f$ is a zerodivisor on $S/JS$. If I can show that $I$ is prime, then I am done. However, I did not get anything out along this way.

Any help?

EDIT: Actually, this is Exercise 6.4 in Eisenbud. I can prove the forward direction, and the backward direction needs the above proposition.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @msteve $(x^2)$ is not an ideal of the form $IS$ $\endgroup$ – Eoin Jun 26 '15 at 19:00
  • $\begingroup$ I would think that it would be easier to show the contrapositive: If $f$ was a zero divisor in one of $S/IS$ then it is in some minimal prime containing $IS$ since $S$ is Noetherian. But then the contraction of this prime ideal is certainly not $R$ and then something with $f$'s coefficients ...something something... not generate $R$. There's a haze there. $\endgroup$ – Eoin Jun 26 '15 at 19:18
  • $\begingroup$ It's true in the one-variable case, by McCoy's theorem, and $R$ doesn't even have to be noetherian. $\endgroup$ – Bernard Jun 26 '15 at 19:31
  • $\begingroup$ @Eoin I don't think the existence of minimal prime needs Noetherianity.... $\endgroup$ – YYF Jun 26 '15 at 20:07
  • $\begingroup$ You're right but the decomposition of $0$ into primes does. (So zero divisors are in the union of the primes belonging to 0). $\endgroup$ – Eoin Jun 26 '15 at 20:09
2
$\begingroup$

Let $f\in R[X_1,\dots,X_n]$ such that $c(f)$, the ideal generated by the coefficients of $f$ equals $R$. Let $I\subset R$ an ideal. We want to prove that $f$ is a non-zero divisor on $R[X_1,\dots,X_n]/IR[X_1,\dots,X_n]$.

First notice that $R[X_1,\dots,X_n]/IR[X_1,\dots,X_n]\simeq (R/I)[X_1,\dots,X_n]$. Then suppose the contrary: there is a non-zero $g\in(R/I)[X_1,\dots,X_n]$ such that $fg=0$. But we know (from this answer) that this entails the following: there is $\hat a\in R/I$, $\hat a\ne\hat 0$ (that is, $a\notin I$) such that $\hat af=0$, which is equivalent to $af\in IR[X_1,\dots,X_n]$, hence $ac(f)\subseteq I$. Since $c(f)=R$ we get $a\in I$, a contradiction.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.