I have come across a question online that I decided to have a stab at; it goes like this:
Question
Let $f(x) := ax - \dfrac{x^3}{1 + x^2}$ where $a$ is a constant.
(i) Show that if $a \geq \dfrac{9}{8}$ then $f'(x) \geq 0\ \ \forall x$
(ii) Sketch the graph of $f$ according to the various value of $a$
Thoughts
For part (i), I showed this by first finding the derivative and then invoking the aforementioned condition on $a$:
$f'(x) = \dfrac{(a-1)x^4 + (2a - 3)x^2 + a}{(1 + x^2)^2} \geq \dfrac{(x^2 - 3)^2}{8(1 + x^2)^2} \geq 0\ \ \forall x$ as required.
Even though I think my demonstration is fine, I do have one question about this part. I did initially try to show the result by considering the discriminant of the numerator in $u = x^2$, which I denote by $D_u$ (because you cannot consider the typical quadratic discriminant for that fourth order equation, right?), according to the condition on $a$. However, I feel it became slightly confusing because: $D_u = -8a + 9 \geq 0$ according to the condition on $a$ given, which would mean that the quadratic in $u$ would have at least one real root. But then, it is only if that root (or those roots) is non-negative that we can determine roots for $f'(x)$. But then this discussion is pointless too because the equation can still have four roots yet never cross the $y$-axis. The only reason I bring this up is because the author seems to passingly suggest that considering the discriminant might help but he isn't clear as to whether this is contextual (that you can use it in other questions like this) or whether the notion pertains to this particular question - could somebody clarify this?
As for part (ii), the issue I have is in both cases, $a \geq \dfrac{9}{8}$ and $a < \dfrac{9}{8}$. In the first case, I know from part (i) that the graph is increasing (and also that $ f(0) = 0$) but the issue is I would have thought that the graph would take an indiscernible shape for larger values of $x$ since:
$f(x) = ax - \dfrac{x^3}{1 + x^2} = ax - \dfrac{1}{\frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{x^2}}$
And so surely the right hand term would dominate this expression for larger $x$? However, when I looked in wolframalpha, the graph seems to be linear for larger values of $x$ - what gives? With regards to the second case, I don't know how to draw that because I don't know how to get information on $f'$ according to that case from the working I did in part (i).
Sorry for this rather drawn out discussion but I just wanted to make sure I put everything across.
Thank you in advance for any help you can give!