Let $F$ be a field, let $\omega$ be a primitive $n$th root of unity in an algebraic closure of $F$. If $a$ in $F$ is not an $m$th power in $F(\omega)$ for any $m\gt 1$ that divides $n$, how to show that $x^n -a$ is irreducible over $F$?

  • $\begingroup$ This breaks down for $n = 4$. In ${\mathbf Q}[x]$, the polynomial $x^4 + 4$ has $a = -4$, which is not a square or 4th power in ${\mathbf Q}$, but this polynomial is reducible over ${\mathbf Q}$: it is $(x^2+2x-2)(x^2-2x-2)$. This counterexample is essentially the only kind of counterexample, in light of Bill Dubuque's answer. $\endgroup$ – KCd Apr 19 '12 at 0:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ 1. You should have: $(x^2 + 2x + 2)(x^2 - 2x + 2)$. 2. This is not a counterexample to the original question, because $-4 = (2i)^2$ and $2i \in Q(i)$ and of course $2$ divides $4$. (Anyway, I've given a proof.) $\endgroup$ – savick01 Apr 19 '12 at 19:25

Here is a classic result:

THEOREM $\ $ Suppose $\rm\:c\in F\:$ a field, and $\rm\:0 < n\in\mathbb Z\:.$

$\rm\quad x^n - c\ $ is irreducible over $\rm\:F \iff c \not\in F^p\:$ for all primes $\rm\:p\: |\: n\:$ and $\rm\ c\not\in -4\:F^4\:$ when $\rm\: 4\ |\ n\:. $

A proof is in many Field Theory textbooks, e.g. Karpilovsky, Topics in Field Theory, Theorem 8.1.6.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ See also Lang's Algebra. There is a whole section about the polynomial $x^n - a$ in the chapter on Galois theory. $\endgroup$ – KCd Apr 19 '12 at 0:20
  • $\begingroup$ I'm apparently at my dullest. Knowing that you cite your sources well, and searching for "Karpilovsky", made it easy. Fixing a few links :-) $\endgroup$ – Jyrki Lahtonen Aug 11 '19 at 16:31

I will assume "$m \geq 1$", since otherwise $a \in F(\omega)$, but $F(\omega)$ is $(n-1)$th extension and not $n$th extension, so $x^n-a$ must have been reducible.

Let $b^n=a$ (from the algebraic closure of $F$).

$x^n-a$ is irreducible even over $F(\omega)$. Otherwise $$f= \prod_{k=0}^n (x-\omega^k b) = (x^p + \cdots + \omega^o b^p)(x^{n-p} + \cdots + \omega^ó b^{n-p}),$$ so $b^p$ and $b^{n-p}$ are in $F(\omega)$. Consequenty $b^{\gcd(p,n-p)}$ is in $F(\omega)$, but $\gcd(p,n-p)$ divides $n$, so $(b^{\gcd})^\frac{n}{\gcd} = a$, a contradiction.

  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand how this proves it. Wouldn't you want to show if $f$ is reducible then a is an $m$th power. It looks like you showed when $f$ is reducible that $a$ is an $n$th power. Also minor thing, the upper index of your product should be $n-1$. $\endgroup$ – Wyatt Kuehster Jul 22 '19 at 1:40
  • $\begingroup$ @WyattKuehster note it has proved that $b^{gcd}\in F $ so that proved the claim. $\endgroup$ – mathemather Nov 19 '19 at 14:58
  • $\begingroup$ @savick01 I did not understand the opening comment. $\endgroup$ – mathemather Nov 19 '19 at 15:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.