I was proving the spectral theorem for normal operators on finite-dimensional complex vector spaces today during a test, when I arrived at the point in which

If $T\in\operatorname{End}(V)$ is normal, then if $W$ is a subspace of $V$ is $T$-invariant "surely" the restriction $T|_W\colon W\to W$ must be normal too.

But the professor said he could find a counterexample. Now, the claim above was true in that case, but I'm still curious about that example. Practically, he said that it can happen that the restriction of the adjoint $T^*$ may not coincide with the adjoint of $T$ in $W$, in other words $$ (T|_W)^*\ne (T^*)|_W. $$

When is it true (in finite-dimensional vector spaces)?


For arbitrary operators, it could be that $W$ is a $T$-invariant subspace, but not a $T^*$ invariant subspace. For example, take $$ T = \pmatrix{1&1\\0&2} $$ Note that $W = \operatorname{span}[(1,0)]$ is $T$-invariant, but not $T^*$ invariant.

On the other hand, if $W$ is both $T$-invariant and $T^*$-invariant, we will necessarily have $(T|_W)^* = (T^*)|_W$. It's easy to see that this should be the case by noting that we can define the adjoint by the property $$ \langle T|_W x, y \rangle = \langle x,(T|_W)^*y \rangle \quad \forall x,y \in W $$

  • $\begingroup$ I see. In my case $W$ was indeed $T$- and $T^*$-invariant. We could have $\langle T(x),y\rangle=\langle T|_W(x),y\rangle=\langle x,(T|_W)^*(y)\rangle=\langle x,T^*(y)\rangle$ if $x,y\in W$. Is that it? Does $T^*(y)=(T|_W)^*(y)$ for all $y\in W$ imply $(T^*)|_W=(T|_W)^*$? $\endgroup$ – yellowquark Jun 25 '15 at 8:57
  • $\begingroup$ @DavideF looks good to me $\endgroup$ – Omnomnomnom Jun 25 '15 at 12:59
  • $\begingroup$ Oh and yes, two functions (linear maps) are the same if they take all the same values $\endgroup$ – Omnomnomnom Jun 25 '15 at 23:27

It is always true for finite dimensional vector spaces. If $T \colon V \rightarrow V$ is a normal operator and $W$ is $T$-invariant, then $W$ is also $T^*$-invariant and hence $T|_W$ is normal (and $(T|_W)^* = T^*|_W$). You can find a proof in Axler's book "Linear Algebra Done Right", Chapter 7.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.