I've got this simple assignment, to find out the density for a give sphere with a radius = 2cm and the mass 296g. It seems straightforward, but it all got hairy when i've got to a fraction with three elements(more precisely a fraction divided by a number actually this was wrong, the whole point was that the number is divided by a fraction, and it's different than a fraction being divided by a number.). I tend to solve these by dividing the element on the bottom by 1, and extracting from that 2 fraction division like this :

$$ \frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} \Rightarrow \frac{\frac{a}{b}}{\frac{c}{1}} \Rightarrow \frac{a}{b} \div \frac{c}{1} => \frac{a}{b} \cdot \frac{1}{c} \Rightarrow \frac {a} {b \cdot c} $$

And it used to work, though for the next example it doesn't seem to, it looks like another technique is used:

$$ \frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} \Rightarrow a \div \frac{b}{c} \Rightarrow a \cdot \frac{c}{b} \Rightarrow \frac {a \cdot c}{ b} $$

For the example below cleary the second method is used/needed, to get the right response. But i'm confused when to use each, as i've use both before, and both gave correct asnwers(matching with the answers at the end of the book).

$$ v = \frac43\pi r^3 $$

$$ d = \frac mv $$

$$ m = 296g $$

$$ r=2cm $$

$$ v = \frac43\pi 2^3 \Rightarrow \frac{32\pi}{3} $$

$$ d = \frac{m}{v} \Rightarrow \frac{296}{\frac{32\pi}{3}} \Rightarrow \frac {296}{32\pi} \div \frac31 \Rightarrow \frac{296}{32\pi} \cdot \frac{1}{3} \Rightarrow \frac{296}{96\pi} \approx 0.9814\frac{g}{cm^3} $$

$$ d_{expected} = 8.8 \frac{g}{cm^3} $$

I am, clearly, missing something fundamental about the use of these.

Can anyone enlighten me please? Can't quite find a good explanation online.


$$\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}}\ne\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{c} \tag 1$$

The left-hand side of $(1)$ can be written as


whereas the right-hand side of $(1)$ can be written as


Let's look at an example: Suppose $a=3$, $b=6$, and $c=2$. Then, we have




  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you. I guess that's the reason latex makes the whole divisor or divident smaller, when it's a fraction. To show that it's the whole thing that's being divided by. I think i have forgot this, and i've been using triple division in very similar situation, which got me out of trouble so far. $\endgroup$ – 6D65 Jun 21 '15 at 16:34
  • $\begingroup$ You're quite welcome! My pleasure. $\endgroup$ – Mark Viola Jun 21 '15 at 16:35

In $\frac{a/b}{c}=\frac{a}{bc}$, we divide $a$ by $b$, then divide the result by $c$.

In $\frac{a}{b/c}=\frac{ac}{b}$, we divide $b$ by $c$, then divide $a$ by the result.

The two mean different things.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well done and succinct! +1 $\endgroup$ – Mark Viola Jun 21 '15 at 16:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you for the explanation. Now it makes sense. $\endgroup$ – 6D65 Jun 21 '15 at 16:35

The reason you're getting non-equivalent expressions from $\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}}$ is because of the step $\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} \Rightarrow \frac{\frac{a}{b}}{\frac{c}{1}}$. It should be $\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} \Rightarrow \frac{\frac{a}{b}}{\frac{1}{c}}$


to use your "introduce 1 to the denominator" approach, you should instead put that 1 with $a$:


(for the same reasons that the others point out)


296/(32pi/3)=(296/32pi)/(3/1) should be =(296/32pi)*(3/1)= 8.833 g/ccm you inverted twice


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.