1
$\begingroup$

I have two statements that I wanto to prove or disprove.

  1. Let $A \in \Bbb R^{n \times n}$ and $b_1,\ldots,b_n \in \Bbb R^n$ be linearly independant. Then, $Ab_1,\ldots,Ab_n$ are also linearly independent.

  2. Let $A \in \Bbb R^{n \times n}$ and $b_1,\ldots,b_n \in \Bbb R^n$ such that $Ab_1,\ldots,Ab_n$ are linearly independent. Then $b_1,\ldots,b_n$ are linearly independent.

If I was dealing with vectors $\vec{x},\vec{y},\vec{z}$ then I would know how to show they are lin. independent by showing that the only solution to

$$\lambda_1 \vec{x}+\lambda_2\vec{y}+ \lambda_3 \vec{z}=0$$

is $\lambda_1=\lambda_2=\lambda_3=0$.

But how does one do this with matrices and single vectors? Can you even say a single vector $b \in \Bbb R^n$ is linearly independent. I always thought you need at least two vectors? How can a matrix be linearly independent?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your two statement says either $b_1,...b_n$ are linearly independent, or $Ab_1, ..., Ab_n$ are linearly independent. They are sets of vectors, not a single vector or a matrix. $\endgroup$ – KittyL Jun 19 '15 at 17:30
  • $\begingroup$ This is not true by the way for any matrix $A$. It is only true with invertible matrices $\endgroup$ – marwalix Jun 19 '15 at 17:32
  • $\begingroup$ @ KittyL Thanks. Just a follow up question. Does $A \in \Bbb R^{n \times n}$ mean that the matrix $A$ has the dimension $n \times n$ and has real valued entries? Are all of these entries scalar values? How can the matrix be linearly independent? $\endgroup$ – qmd Jun 19 '15 at 17:38
  • $\begingroup$ @marwalix Thanks. But why is that? Is that something that I need to prove in this proof? $\endgroup$ – qmd Jun 19 '15 at 17:41
  • $\begingroup$ Your first statement is true if $A$ is a nonsingular matrix, and most matrices are nonsingular. It is false if $A$ is singular. $\endgroup$ – Michael Hardy Jun 19 '15 at 17:44
1
$\begingroup$

For (1) consider the case $n=2$ and \begin{align*} A&=\begin{bmatrix}0&0\\0&0\end{bmatrix} & \vec b_1 &= \begin{bmatrix}1\\0\end{bmatrix} & \vec b_2 &= \begin{bmatrix}0\\1\end{bmatrix} \end{align*} What is the answer to your question in this case?

To generalize this example, suppose $A$ is nonsingular. Then $\DeclareMathOperator{rank}{rank}\rank(A)=m<n$. It follows that each of $A\vec b_1,\dotsc,A\vec b_n$ lives in an $m$-dimensional subspace of $\Bbb R^n$. Since $m<n$ this implies that the vectors $A\vec b_1,\dotsc,A\vec b_n$ are linearly dependent.

For (2) suppose that $$ \lambda_1 \vec b_1+\dotsb+\lambda_n \vec b_n=\vec 0 $$ Applying $A$ to the equation gives $$ \lambda_1 A\vec b_1+\dotsb+\lambda_n A\vec b_n=A\vec 0=\vec 0 $$ But we are given that $\{A\vec b_1,\dotsc,A\vec b_n\}$ are linearly independent. What does this allow us to conclude about $\lambda_1,\dotsc,\lambda_n$? How does this prove/disprove the statement?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer. For (1): In that case the resulting vectors $$Ab_1=Ab_2=\begin{pmatrix}0 \\0 \end{pmatrix}$$ Are not linearly independent because they are the same vector. So anytime the matrix $A$ has $0$ as all its entries, the first statement is false $\endgroup$ – qmd Jun 19 '15 at 17:54
1
$\begingroup$

If $Ab_1,\ldots,Ab_n$ are linearly independent, then there are no scalars $\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_n$ satisfying $\lambda_1 Ab_1+\cdots+\lambda_n Ab_n=0$ except $\lambda_1=\cdots=\lambda_n=0$. Now observe that $$ \lambda_1 Ab_1+\cdots+\lambda_n Ab_n=A(\lambda_1 b_1 + \cdots+\lambda_n b_n). $$ Therefore the latter expression cannot be $0$ unless $\lambda_1 = \cdots = \lambda_n = 0$. If the $A(\lambda_1 b_1 + \cdots+\lambda_n b_n)=0$, one cannot infer that $\lambda_1 b_1 + \cdots+\lambda_n b_n=0$ without more information, but one can say that if $\lambda_1 b_1 + \cdots+\lambda_n b_n=0$ then $A(\lambda_1 b_1 + \cdots+\lambda_n b_n)=0$, and we've just shown that cannot happen unless $\lambda_1 b_1 + \cdots+\lambda_n b_n=0$.

Thus $b_1,\ldots,b_n$ must be linearly independent in that case.

If $b_1,\ldots,b_n$ are linearly independent, that doesn't mean $Ab_1,\ldots,Ab_n$ are linearly independent unless $A$ has linearly independent columns. Notice that no matter which vector $b$ is, the vector $Ab$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A$. If those are linearly dependent, then and $n$ linear combinations of them, i.e. any $Ab_1,\ldots,Ab_n$, will be linearly dependent.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Took me a while to digest but it helped me a lot. Thanks! Is there a way to accept two answers? Both your and brian's answer helped me. $\endgroup$ – qmd Jun 19 '15 at 18:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.