2
$\begingroup$

This is probably stupid but I don't see an argument.

Let \begin{eqnarray} P&\rightarrow & X\\ \downarrow&&\downarrow\\ Y&\rightarrow& Z \end{eqnarray} be a homotopy cartesian diagram of simplicial sets. You can assume for example that $X\to Z$ is a Kan fibration and the diagram is cartesian in the categorical sense.

Is \begin{eqnarray} \pi_0P&\rightarrow & \pi_0X\\ \downarrow&&\downarrow\\ \pi_0Y&\rightarrow& \pi_0Z \end{eqnarray} a cartesian diagram of sets?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

This isn't true in spaces, certainly: take the homotopy pullback of $* \to S^1 \gets *$, which is $\Omega S^1$. We have that $*$ and $S^1$ are connected, but $\Omega S^1$ is not, since $\pi_0(\Omega S^1) = \pi_1(S^1) = \mathbb{Z}$.

Now hit everything with the singular complex functor.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ As I feared, it was stupid. Thank you very much. I understand better now what I wanted. $\endgroup$ – ferret Apr 18 '12 at 14:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.