I am trying to solve these two problems on diagrams of module morphisms:

1) Let $$\begin{array}{c} M' & \xrightarrow{f_1} & M & \xrightarrow{f_2} & M'' \\ & & \downarrow{\beta} & & \downarrow{\gamma} \\ N' & \xrightarrow{g_1} & N & \xrightarrow{g_2} & N'' \\ \end{array}$$

a commutative diagram of $R$-modules with horizontal exact lines and $g_1$ injective. Show that there exists a unique morphism $M' \to N'$ that completes the diagram.

2) Let $$\begin{array}{c} M' & \xrightarrow{f_1} & M & \xrightarrow{f_2} & M''&\rightarrow &0 \\ \downarrow{\alpha} & & \downarrow{\beta} \\ N' & \xrightarrow{g_1} & N & \xrightarrow{g_2} & N'' \\ \end{array}$$

a commutative diagram of $R$-modules with exact horizontal lines. Show that there is a unique morphism $\gamma:M'' \to N''$ which completes the diagram.

In 1) I have the following doubt: suppose the image of $\beta \circ f_1$ is "bigger" than the image of $g_1$. Then, no matter how I define $\alpha$, I am not gonna get $\beta \circ f_1=g_1 \circ \alpha$.

In 2), if $\gamma$ exists then $\gamma \circ f_2=g_2 \circ \beta$, and since $f_2$ is surjective, then for all $x \in M''$, there is $m \in M$ with $f_2(m)=x$. I am confused on how to explicitly define $\gamma$ in each $x \in M''$, I mean, by the condition above I see there is only one way of defining it but I don't know how to explicitly show the morphism.

Any help with the problem would be greatly appreciated.


Consider $$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} {} @. M' @>f_1>> M @>f_2>> M'' \\ @. @. @V\beta VV @V\gamma VV \\ 0 @>>> N' @>g_1>> N @>g_2>> N'' \end{CD} $$ Without loss of generality we can assume that $N'$ is a submodule of $N$ and that $g_1$ is the inclusion map. Since $g_2\beta f_1=\gamma f_2f_1=0$, we know that the image of $\beta f_1$ is contained in $\ker g_2=N$ and the statement is proved.

The second statement is dual.

  • $\begingroup$ I don't see why $Im \beta f_1 \subset ker g_2$ implies the existence of the morphism, could you explain this? $\endgroup$ – user156441 Jun 19 '15 at 13:39
  • $\begingroup$ @user156441 This means that $\text{Im}(\beta f_1)\subseteq N'$, so we can “corestrict” it. $\endgroup$ – egreg Jun 19 '15 at 15:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.