5
$\begingroup$

The Dirichlet $\beta$-function is defined for $\Re(s)>0$ as:

$$\beta(s) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)^s}$$

It has the following Euler product (I used that Dirichlet character $\chi_{4}(p)=\sin\left(\frac{p \,\pi}{2}\right)$):

$$\prod_p \bigg(\frac {p^s}{p^s-\sin\left(\frac{p \,\pi}{2}\right)} \bigg)$$

Numerical evidence suggests that this Euler product also (slowly) converges for values $\Re(s)>\frac12$.

Does convergence in the domain $\frac12 < \Re(s) \le 1$ indeed occur? If so, could this be proven (I guess a proof would also imply that all complex zeros of $\beta(s)$ must reside on the critical line)?

P.S.:

Just to share that by multiplying the Leibniz formula for $\pi$ ($\beta(1)=\frac{\pi}{4}$) and this formula (35), gives the very elegant relationship:

$$\prod_p \bigg(\frac{p-\sin\left(\frac{p \,\pi}{2}\right)}{{p+\sin\left(\frac{p \,\pi}{2}\right)}} \bigg)=2$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is going to revolve around the convergence of the series $ \sum_p \chi_4(p) p^{-s} $ for $1/2<\Re(s)\leqslant 1$. I don't think we have enough information about the pattern of the primes modulo 4 to be able to say anything helpful. (Of course the nature of the beast is that such a relationship is equivalent to the function's Riemann hypothesis.) $\endgroup$ – Chappers Jun 16 '15 at 15:36
  • $\begingroup$ Chappers, you are probably right, although this is one of the very few Euler products that I know of that converges for $s=1$ ($\beta(1)$ is a well-known formula). Hence it could be an indication that further convergence exists. Numercal evidence does indeed suggest (very slow) convergence continues in the strip, however certainly not $\le \frac12$. $\endgroup$ – Agno Jun 16 '15 at 20:37
  • $\begingroup$ $\chi_4(2n+1) = (-1)^n$. Then $\sum_p \chi_4(p)p^{-s}$ and hence $\prod_p \frac{1}{1-\chi_4(p)p^{-s}}$ converge for $\Re(s) > \sigma$ iff $L(s,\chi_4)$ has no zeros for $\Re(s) > \sigma$ (the proof of $\Longleftarrow$ is very similar to the prime number theorem) $\endgroup$ – reuns Nov 29 '17 at 22:17
  • $\begingroup$ @reuns Thanks and clear. I have learned a lot since this question and wouldn't have asked it today. $\endgroup$ – Agno Nov 30 '17 at 14:03
  • $\begingroup$ Sure. To me this equivalence between the zeros and the abscissa of convergence is really the fundamental theorem of the theory of $\zeta(s), L(s,\chi)$, more than the PNT. $\endgroup$ – reuns Nov 30 '17 at 14:14
1
$\begingroup$

Since the product (over primes) for Dirichlet L-series is valid only for $\Re{(s)}>1$, as mentioned in all textbooks on this subject, the answer to Agno initial question is that not even the `easiest' case $s=1$ is proved for $\prod_p \bigg(\frac {p^s}{p^s-\sin\left(\frac{p \,\pi}{2}\right)} \bigg)$. I have investigated these products for $1/2 < \Re{(s)} \le 1$ for a while and also detected a slow numerical convergence, but this was just a conclusion on experimental computations, nothing such as a formal proof.

P.S.: Could someone (maybe Agno, himself, or Reuns) provide a reference in literature (or internet) for the formal proof of "the equivalence between the zeros and the abscissa of convergence" mentioned by Reuns?

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.